Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332584›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Effects of inspiratory muscle training in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis.

ShuQi Zheng, Qi Zhang, ShuiYan Li, Shilin Li, Qiuru Yao, Xiaoyan Zheng, Gege Li, Yuting Zeng, Ling Chen, Shuping Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

ShuQi Zheng *School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi Zhang *School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
ShuiYan Li *School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shilin LiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuru YaoSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan ZhengSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gege LiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuting ZengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuping ChenSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Longlong HeSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jihua ZouSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZengSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on hypertension and provide guidance for its clinical application as an auxiliary approach. Methods: Articles published prior to July 2022 were searched in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. Included were randomized controlled studies that used IMT to treat individuals with hypertension. The mean difference (MD) was computed using the Revman 5.4 software. In individuals with hypertension, the effects of IMT on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and pulse pressure (PP) were compared and studied. Results: There were found to be eight randomized controlled trials totaling 215 patients. According to a meta-analysis, the IMT reduced the SBP (MD: -12.55 mmHg, 95% CI: -15.78, -9.33), DBP (MD: -4.77 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.00, -3.54), HR (MD: -5.92 bpm, 95% CI: -8.72, -3.12), and PP (MD: -8.92 mmHg, 95% CI: -12.08, -5.76) in patients with hypertension. In subgroup analyses, low-intensity IMT showed a better reduction in SBP (MD: -14.47 mmHg, 95% CI: -17.60, -11.34), DBP (MD: -7.70 mmHg, 95% CI: -10.21, -5.18). Conclusion: IMT may become an auxiliary means to improve the four hemodynamic indexes (SBP, DBP, HR and PP) in patients with hypertension. In subgroup analyses, low-intensity IMT was more effective in regulating blood pressure than medium-high-intensity IMT. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022300908.

Indexed as

blood pressurehypertensionIMTinspiratory muscle trainingmeta—analysis

Identifiers

PMID37332584
PMCPMC10270119
OpenAlexW4377822901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.