Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332512›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbes2022

Reduction and discharge of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Chicago-area water reclamation plants.

Christopher Owen, Dorothy Wright-Foulkes, Prisila Alvarez, Haidy Delgado, Eva C Durance, George F Wells, Rachel Poretsky, Abhilasha Shrestha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher OwenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0804-752X
Dorothy Wright-FoulkesDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60610, United States.
Prisila AlvarezDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Haidy DelgadoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Eva C DuranceDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
George F WellsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-1628
Rachel PoretskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-449X
Abhilasha ShresthaDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60610, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is commonly excreted in the feces and urine of infected individuals and is, therefore, detected in wastewaters where infection is present in the surrounding population. Water reclamation plants (WRPs) that treat these wastewaters commonly discharge treated effluents into the surrounding environment, yet little is known about the removal or persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA through wastewater treatment systems and potential for eventual release into the environment. We collected 361 24-hour composite influent and effluent samples from seven WRPs in the Greater Chicago Area in Illinois. Samples were collected over a period of 21 weeks for three large WRPs (with design max flows of 1.89-2.32 billion gallons per day and serving a combined population of 4.62 million people) and 11 weeks for four smaller WRPs (with design max flows of 96.3-186 million gallons per day and serving a combined population of >0.5 million people). A total of two of the larger WRPs implemented seasonal disinfection (using UV light or chlorination/dechlorination) for 8 weeks of this sampling period. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was quantified in the influent and effluent samples by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) of the N1 and N2 targets of the nucleocapsid (N) gene. Although SARS-CoV-2 RNA was regularly detected in influent and effluent from all WRPs, viral RNA concentrations in the effluent samples were considerably lower, with mean effluent: influent gene copy concentration ratios ranging from 1:160 to 1:2.95 between WRPs. Samples collected while disinfection was active vs. inactive did not show any significant difference in the portion of RNA persisting through the treatment process (

Indexed as

COVID-19disinfectioneffluentSARS-CoV-2wastewater-based epidemiologywastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37332512
PMCPMC10117756
OpenAlexW4229070613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.