Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332420›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Multifaceted Role of Social Media in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Need for Quality Control.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Shanmugapriya Kumar, Naveen Jeyaraman, Preethi Selvaraj, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Suresh K Bondili, Sankalp Yadav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Understanding TikTok's Role in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Awareness and Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madhan JeyaramanOrthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR (M.G.Ramachandran) Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Swaminathan RamasubramanianMedicine, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai, IND.
Shanmugapriya KumarRespiratory Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR (M.G.Ramachandran) Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Naveen JeyaramanOrthopaedics, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Nellikuppam, IND.
Preethi SelvarajCommunity Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR (M.G.Ramachandran) Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Arulkumar NallakumarasamyOrthopaedics and Traumatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Suresh K BondiliMedical Oncology, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Sankalp YadavMedicine, Shri Madan Lal Khurana Chest Clinic, Moti Nagar, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media, leveraging Web 2.0 technologies, plays a vital role in healthcare, medical education, and research by fostering collaboration and enabling research dissemination. Healthcare professionals use these platforms to improve public health literacy, but concerns about misinformation and content accuracy persist. In 2023, platforms like Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, California, United States), YouTube (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States), Instagram (Meta Platforms, Inc.), TikTok (ByteDance Ltd, Beijing, China), and Twitter (X Corp., Carson City, Nevada, United States) have become essential in healthcare, offering patient communication, professional development, and knowledge-sharing opportunities. However, challenges such as breaches of patient confidentiality and unprofessional conduct remain. Social media has transformed medical education, providing unique networking and professional development opportunities. Further studies are needed to determine its educational value. Healthcare professionals must follow ethical and professional guidelines, particularly regarding patient privacy, confidentiality, disclosure rules, and copyright laws. Social media significantly impacts patient education and healthcare research. Platforms like WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.) effectively improve patient compliance and outcomes. Yet, the rapid dissemination of false news and misinformation on social media platforms presents risks. Researchers must consider potential biases and content quality when extracting data. Quality control and regulation are crucial in addressing potential dangers and misinformation in social media and healthcare. Stricter regulations and monitoring are needed due to cases of deaths resulting from social media trends and false news spread. Ethical frameworks, informed consent practices, risk assessments, and appropriate data management strategies are essential for responsible research using social media technologies. Healthcare professionals and researchers must judiciously use social media, considering its risks to maximize benefits and mitigate potential drawbacks. By striking the right balance, healthcare professionals can enhance patient outcomes, medical education, research, and the overall healthcare experience.

Indexed as

effects of social mediahealthcarelatest researchmedical educationpatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID37332420
PMCPMC10272627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.