Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332339›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2023

The use of an artificial intelligence algorithm for circulating tumor cell detection in patients with esophageal cancer.

Takahisa Akashi, Tomoyuki Okumura, Kenji Terabayashi, Yuki Yoshino, Haruyoshi Tanaka, Takeyoshi Yamazaki, Yoshihisa Numata, Takuma Fukuda, Takahiro Manabe, Hayato Baba and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takahisa AkashiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Tomoyuki OkumuraDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Kenji TerabayashiDepartment of Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.
Yuki YoshinoDepartment of Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.
Haruyoshi TanakaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takeyoshi YamazakiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Yoshihisa NumataDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takuma FukudaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takahiro ManabeDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Hayato BabaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takeshi MiwaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Toru WatanabeDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Katsuhisa HiranoDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takamichi IgarashiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Shinichi SekineDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Isaya HashimotoDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Kazuto ShibuyaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Shozo HojoDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Isaku YoshiokaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Koshi MatsuiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Akane YamadaDepartment of Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.
Tohru SasakiDepartment of Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.
Tsutomu FujiiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
University of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in multidisciplinary treatments of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), patients frequently suffer from distant metastasis after surgery. For numerous types of cancer, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are considered predictors of distant metastasis, therapeutic response and prognosis. However, as more markers of cytopathological heterogeneity are discovered, the overall detection process for the expression of these markers in CTCs becomes increasingly complex and time consuming. In the present study, the use of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) for CTC detection was assessed using KYSE ESCC cell lines and blood samples from patients with ESCC. The AI algorithm distinguished KYSE cells from peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers, accompanied with epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and nuclear DAPI staining, with an accuracy of >99.8% when the AI was trained on the same KYSE cell line. In addition, AI trained on KYSE520 distinguished KYSE30 from PBMCs with an accuracy of 99.8%, despite the marked differences in EpCAM expression between the two KYSE cell lines. The average accuracy of distinguishing KYSE cells from PBMCs for the AI and four researchers was 100 and 91.8%, respectively (P=0.011). The average time to complete cell classification for 100 images by the AI and researchers was 0.74 and 630.4 sec, respectively (P=0.012). The average number of EpCAM-positive/DAPI-positive cells detected in blood samples by the AI was 44.5 over 10 patients with ESCC and 2.4 over 5 healthy volunteers (P=0.019). These results indicated that the CNN-based image processing algorithm for CTC detection provides a higher accuracy and shorter analysis time compared to humans, suggesting its applicability for clinical use in patients with ESCC. Moreover, the finding that AI accurately identified even EpCAM-negative KYSEs suggested that the AI algorithm may distinguish CTCs based on as yet unknown features, independent of known marker expression.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecirculating tumor cellsepithelial cell adhesion moleculeesophageal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37332339
PMCPMC10272959
OpenAlexW4379876040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.