Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332281›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2023

Effects of different stocking density and various phytogenic feed additives dosage levels on growing-finishing pigs.

Hyun Ah Cho, Min Ho Song, Ji Hwan Lee, Han Jin Oh, Yong Ju Kim, Jae Woo An, Se Yeon Chang, Young Bin Go, Dong Cheol Song, Seung Yeol Cho and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional Additives in a Selected European Sea Bass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyun Ah ChoDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-6715
Min Ho SongDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-5212
Ji Hwan LeeDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia (UGA), Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-4853
Han Jin OhDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-483X
Yong Ju KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-0884
Jae Woo AnDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-5499
Se Yeon ChangDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2982
Young Bin GoDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-6970
Dong Cheol SongDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-603X
Seung Yeol ChoEugene-Bio, Suwon 16675, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-1053
Dong Jun KimEugene-Bio, Suwon 16675, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-0527
Mi Suk KimEugene-Bio, Suwon 16675, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-8701
Hae Ryoung ParkKorea Agriculture Technology Promotion Agency, Iksan 54667, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-8177
Hyeun Bum KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-6090
Jin Ho ChoDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778
Chungbuk National University · KRSuwon Research Institute · KRChungnam National University · KRDankook University · KRNational IT industry Promotion Agency · KRUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was to investigate the effects of different phytogenic feed additives (PFA) dosage levels in growing- finishing pigs stressed by high stocking density. A total of 72 mix sexed 12 weeks growing pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) with initial body weight (BW) of 49.28 ± 4.58 kg were used for 8 weeks. There were 3 replicate pens in each treatment group, with 3 pigs per pen. The dietary treatment groups consisted of basal diets in animal welfare density (negative control [NC]), basal diet in high stocking density (positive control [PC]), PC + 0.04% essential oil (ES1), PC + 0.08% essential oil (ES2), PC + 0.10% bitter citrus extract & essential oil (CES1), PC + 0.20% bitter citrus extract & essential oil (CES2), PC + 0.05% grape pomace extract (GP1), PC + 0.10% grape pomace extract (GP2). The reduction of space allowance decreased (

Indexed as

AdditiveDosagePigPlant extractStocking densityStress

Identifiers

PMID37332281
PMCPMC10271929
OpenAlexW4321097745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.