Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332144›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

The experiences of psychiatric patients, their caregivers and companions in upholding patient dignity during hospitalization: A qualitative study.

Amirahmad Shojaei, Yosra Raziani, Colleen Bernstein, Ali Asgari, Farshid Alazmani-Noodeh, Mohammadreza Arab, Hadi Ranjbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The experiences of psychiatric patients, their caregivers and companions in upholding patient dignity during hospitalization: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amirahmad ShojaeiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-9578
Yosra RazianiDepartment of Nursing, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hillah, Babylon, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-4391-3833
Colleen BernsteinDepartment of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-4794
Ali AsgariInfectious Diseases Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farshid Alazmani-NoodehCritical Care Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-1648
Mohammadreza ArabDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran.
Hadi RanjbarMental Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3672-7266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe quality of care and patient satisfaction is closely linked with dignity, which is a crucial component of therapy and care. However, there is very little study on dignity in the context of mental health care. Planning for ongoing patient care might benefit from an understanding of the notion of dignity by exploring the experiences of patients, caregivers and companions of patients who have a history of hospitalization in mental health institutions. To retain patients' dignity while they were being treated in mental wards, this study sought to understand the experiences of patients, caregivers and companions of patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis investigation was qualitative. Semistructured interviews and focus groups were utilized to collect the data. The purposeful sampling method was employed for participant recruitment, which continued until data saturation. Two focus group discussions and 27 interviews were conducted. Participants included 8 patients, 2 patients' family members (companions), 3 psychologists, 4 nurses and 11 psychiatrists. Two focus group discussions were held with seven family members or companions of patients. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis.

resultsThe primary theme that emerged was the infringement of patients' dignity, through negative guardianship, dehumanization and violations of their rights. Subthemes included dehumanization, worthlessness and namelessness, patient rights violations and stripping patients of authority.

conclusionOur results suggest that, regardless of the severity of the illness, the nature of psychiatric illness significantly compromises patients' dignity. Mental health practitioners, due to their sense of guardianship, may unintentionally treat patients with mental health disorders, thus compromising the patient's dignity. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research team's experiences as a psychiatrist, doctor and nurse informed the study's objectives. Nurses and psychiatrists who work in the healthcare industry designed and conducted the study. The primary authors, who are healthcare providers, collected and analysed the required data. Furthermore, the entire study team contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Study participants were involved in the data collection and analysis.

Indexed as

CaregiversRespectFriendsHospitalizationHumansQualitative Researchdignityhospitalizationnegative guardianshippsychiatric patient

Identifiers

PMID37332144
PMCPMC10485317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.