Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332022›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2023

Exploring skeletal muscle tolerance and whole-body metabolic effects of FDA-approved drugs in a volumetric muscle loss model.

Shefali R Bijwadia, Christiana J Raymond-Pope, Alec M Basten, Mason T Lentz, Thomas J Lillquist, Jarrod A Call, Sarah M Greising

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shefali R BijwadiaSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-4075
Christiana J Raymond-PopeSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-5904
Alec M BastenSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1827-2007
Mason T LentzSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0229-9293
Thomas J LillquistSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1959-1763
Jarrod A CallDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-4940
Sarah M GreisingSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-4908
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is associated with persistent functional impairment due to a lack of de novo muscle regeneration. As mechanisms driving the lack of regeneration continue to be established, adjunctive pharmaceuticals to address the pathophysiology of the remaining muscle may offer partial remediation. Studies were designed to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of two FDA-approved pharmaceutical modalities to address the pathophysiology of the remaining muscle tissue after VML injury: (1) nintedanib (an anti-fibrotic) and (2) combined formoterol and leucine (myogenic promoters). Tolerance was first established by testing low- and high-dosage effects on uninjured skeletal muscle mass and myofiber cross-sectional area in adult male C57BL/6J mice. Next, tolerated doses of the two pharmaceutical modalities were tested in VML-injured adult male C57BL/6J mice after an 8-week treatment period for their ability to modulate muscle strength and whole-body metabolism. The most salient findings indicate that formoterol plus leucine mitigated the loss in muscle mass, myofiber number, whole-body lipid oxidation, and muscle strength, and resulted in a higher whole-body metabolic rate (p ≤ 0.016); nintedanib did not exacerbate or correct aspects of the muscle pathophysiology after VML. This supports ongoing optimization efforts, including scale-up evaluations of formoterol treatment in large animal models of VML.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesRegenerationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalLeucineMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, SkeletalPharmaceutical PreparationsLeucinePharmaceutical Preparationsformoterolmuscle functionneuromusculoskeletal injurynintedanibskeletal muscle injury

Identifiers

PMID37332022
PMCPMC10277213
OpenAlexW4381149498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.