Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332021›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Baseline Body Surface Area and Itch Severity Define Response to Baricitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis at Week 16.

Jacob P Thyssen, Marjolein de Bruin-Weller, Antonio Costanzo, Susanne Grond, Christopher Schuster, Chunyuan Liu, Maria Jose Rueda, Yun-Fei Chen, Andreas Pinter, Thomas Bieber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Jacob P ThyssenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jacob.pontoppidan.thyssen@region.dk.
Marjolein de Bruin-WellerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, National Expertise Center of Atopic Dermatitis, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonio CostanzoDermatology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Susanne GrondEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christopher SchusterEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Chunyuan LiuTigermed-BDM Inc, Somerset, NJ, USA.
Maria Jose RuedaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yun-Fei ChenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andreas PinterDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas BieberDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USBispebjerg Hospital · DKIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and high symptom burden, especially through itch. Baricitinib (BARI), an oral Janus Kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is approved in Europe, Japan, and other countries, for treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who are candidates for systemic therapy. This post hoc analysis of a Phase 3 topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination therapy trial (BREEZE-AD7) aims to characterize patients who might benefit most from BARI.

methodClassification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify baseline predictors for patients treated with BARI 4-mg, who achieved ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75), or EASI75 or Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4-point improvement at week 16 (responders), versus non-responders. Subgroup efficacy analyses were performed based on identified predictor variables, combined with Itch NRS < 7/ ≥ 7. Missing data were imputed as non-responder.

resultsBaseline body surface area (BSA) was identified by CART as strongest variable predicting response to BARI at week 16, with a cut-off around 40% (BSA ≤ 40%). When combining BSA with itch severity, highest response rates were achieved by BARI patients with BSA ≤ 40%/Itch NRS ≥ 7 at baseline. In this subgroup, 69% and 58% of patients treated with BARI 4-mg achieved EASI75 and Itch NRS ≥ 4-point response at week 16, respectively. While these response rates were 65% and 50% for BARI 4-mg patients with baseline BSA ≤ 40%/Itch NRS < 7, they were 33% and 11% in BSA > 40%/Itch NRS < 7, and 32% and 49% in BSA > 40%/Itch NRS ≥ 7 subgroups, respectively.

conclusionUsing a machine learning approach, patients with moderate-to-severe AD and a BSA affecting 10-40% and Itch NRS ≥ 7 were characterized as likely to benefit most from BARI 4-mg TCS combination therapy. This was confirmed by subgroup analyses, which showed that these patients are most likely to show favorable response rates in improving AD signs and symptoms, specifically itch, after 16 weeks of treatment.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicAzetidinesBody Surface AreaDouble-Blind MethodHumansPruritusPurinesPyrazolesSeverity of Illness IndexSkinSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeAzetidinesbaricitinibPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamidesAtopic dermatitisClassification and regression tree analysisSevere itch

Identifiers

PMID37332021
PMCPMC10329959
OpenAlexW4381149610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.