Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37331269›Full record

ArticleNurse education today2023

Design of online formative assessment of nursing humanities curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic: A teaching practice research.

Tianjiao Ma, Hua Yuan, Xinyu Yang, Yin Li, Jiannan Yao, Dongmei Mu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse education today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianjiao MaSchool of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China; Institute of Communication and Social Governance, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: matianjiao216@jlu.edu.cn.
Hua YuanSchool of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: yuanh@jlu.edu.cn.
Xinyu YangDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China; School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: xyyang21@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Yin LiSchool of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: liyin@jlu.edu.cn.
Jiannan YaoSchool of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: yaojn20@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Dongmei MuDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Electronic address: moudm@jlu.edu.cn.
Jilin University · CNFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnder the digital transformation trend nursing education, online formative assessment (OFA) provides a new opportunity. However, the OFA of nursing humanities course lacks design and practice, and faces the challenge of enhancing effective communication between teachers and students, student participation and autonomous learning.

objectivesTo enhance the reliability of OFA in nursing humanities courses and provide practical experience for online teaching in the nursing profession.

designA quantitative research approach was used.

settingThis study was conducted in a comprehensive university in China.

participantsWe conducted teaching practice on 185 nursing undergraduates, with 89 students in the experimental group, and 96 students in the control group.

methodsIn the 2020-2021 multicultural nursing course, student learning outcomes and questionnaires were analyzed through the online learning tool Superstar Learning, student feedback and satisfaction questionnaires, and descriptive analysis and independent sample t-tests were conducted using SPSS 25.0 software.

resultsThe OFA of students using Superstar Learning differed in learning performance and time to receive feedback from teachers between the experimental and control groups, and both groups had higher satisfaction levels. The experimental group's instructional design contained a synchronous classroom discussion module with better participation.

conclusionsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of online learning tools can support the implementation of OFA, build an environment where teachers and students participate together, have a positive impact on the continuous updating of teachers' teaching programs and students' learning outcomes. Simultaneous classroom discussions are expected to be an effective way to improve the reliability of OFA. Our instructional design, provides best practice suggestions for future online teaching and learning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, NursingCurriculumHumanitiesHumansPandemicsReproducibility of ResultsCOVID-19DiscussionNursing educationOnline formative assessmentOnline teaching

Identifiers

PMID37331269
PMCPMC10249362
OpenAlexW4379879132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.