ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
Brain abscess as a complication of nasopharyngeal COVID-19 swab testing: Two case reports and a literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceThe nasopharyngeal swab, which has experienced a marked increase in utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic and is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 testing due to its high diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, The procedure is generally safe and well-tolerated, with pain, discomfort, and the urge to cough or sneeze being the most common complications. Though it is occasionally associated with serious complications. CASE PRESENTATION: we report two cases of brain abscess as a complication of nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing. The first case was of a 47-year-old male diabetic patient with a positive medical history for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who developed a frontal brain abscess one week after the swabbing procedure and was treated with systemic antibiotics followed by a successful functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The second case involved a hypertensive female patient in her 40s who also developed a frontal brain abscess on the same side as painful nasal COVID-19 testing. Systemic antibiotics were used to treat the patient. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Serious adverse events from nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing were reported to occur rarely, with incidences ranging from 0.0012 to 0.026 %. Retained swabs, epistaxis, and CSF leakage were commonly reported complications, which were frequently associated with high-risk factors such as septal deviations, pre-existing basal skull defects, and sinus surgeries. However, brain abscess complications are considered one of the extremely rare complications, with only a few cases reported in the literature.
conclusionAppropriate approaches that depend on adequate anatomical knowledge are necessary for practitioners to perform nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.