Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37330972›Full record

ArticleOncology and therapy2023

Real-World Biomarker Test Utilization and Subsequent Treatment in Patients with Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States, 2011-2021.

Jessie T Yan, Yue Jin, Ernest Lo, Yilin Chen, Amy E Hanlon Newell, Ying Kong, Landon J Inge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence ofLung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Opportunities for use of neuroimaging in de-risking drug development and improving clinical outcomes in psychiatry: an industry perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessie T YanRoche Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA, USA. jessie.yan@roche.com.
Yue JinRoche Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Ernest LoRoche Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Yilin ChenThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-3881
Amy E Hanlon NewellClinical Development/Medical Affairs, Global, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ying KongClinical Development/Medical Affairs, Global, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Landon J IngeClinical Development/Medical Affairs, Global, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0082-3464
Roche (United States) · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBiomarker testing is increasingly crucial for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (eNSCLC). We explored biomarker test utilization and subsequent treatment in eNSCLC patients in the real-world setting.

methodsUsing COTA's oncology database, this retrospective observational study included adult patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with eNSCLC (disease stage 0-IIIA) between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2021. Date of first eNSCLC diagnosis was the study index date. We reported testing rates by index year for patients who received any biomarker test within 6 months of eNSCLC diagnosis and by each molecular marker. We also evaluated treatments received among patients receiving the five most common biomarker tests.

resultsAmong the 1031 eNSCLC patients included in the analysis, 764 (74.1%) received ≥ 1 biomarker test within 6 months of eNSCLC diagnosis. Overall, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 64%), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK; 60%), programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1; 48%), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1; 46%), B-Raf proto-oncogene (40%), mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (35%), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (29%), RET proto-oncogene (22%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (21%), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (20%) were the 10 most frequently tested biomarkers. The proportion of patients undergoing biomarker testing rose from 55.3% in 2011 to 88.1% in 2021. The most common testing methods were Sanger sequencing for EGFR (244, 37%), FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) for ALK (464, 75%) and ROS1 (357, 76%), immunohistochemical assay for PD-L1 (450, 90%), and next-generation sequencing testing for other biomarkers. Almost all the 763 patients who received the five most common biomarker tests had a test before the initiation of a systemic treatment.

conclusionThis study suggests a high biomarker testing rate among patients with eNSCLC in the US, with testing rates for various biomarkers increasing over the past decade, indicating a continuous trend towards the personalization of treatment decisions.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnostic testingEarly-stageNon-small cell lung cancerReal-world testing

Identifiers

PMID37330972
PMCPMC10447355
OpenAlexW4381094078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.