Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37330641›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Older Adults' Perspectives of Independence Through Time: Results of a Longitudinal Interview Study.

Emily Taylor, Victoria A Goodwin, Susan Ball, Andrew Clegg, Lesley Brown, Julia Frost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Healthy aging in frail older adults: Active aging project of a national survey.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily TaylorFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-3249
Victoria A GoodwinFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-9607
Susan BallNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-1097
Lesley BrownAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Julia FrostFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesUnderstanding how older people experience independence has implications for person-centered care. Existing understanding of older people's experience of independence, generated through methods that provide a "snapshot" view of a person's independence at a given time point, provides little insight into the process of maintaining independence through time. The aim of this study was to explore older participants' perceptions to understand the processes and resources that were most important for maintaining independence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsTwo semistructured interviews were conducted longitudinally to explore the perspectives of 12 community-dwelling, older people, aged 76-85 years. A social constructivist approach, using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the interpretation of the data. Sixteen analytical questions guided the exploration of participants' perceptions of independence through time.

resultsOlder people suggested that objective representations underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their independence through time. Some participants perceived "snapshot" judgments of their independence as insensitive to their individual values and context. Change over time required some participants to adapt their methods for maintaining independence. The stability of participants' sense of independence was value dependent and informed by the purpose a participant ascribed to maintaining independence. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study augments the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people's views, showing areas of commonality, and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides an important understanding of how function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedHumansLongitudinal StudiesQualitative ResearchAutonomy and self-efficacyLife course/life spanPerson-centered careResilience

Identifiers

PMID37330641
PMCPMC10825833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.