Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37330570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Associations between intrinsic capacity, functional difficulty, and fall outcomes among older adults in India.

K Muneera, T Muhammad, Manacy Pai, Waquar Ahmed, S Althaf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

K MuneeraNational Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala, 673601, India.
T MuhammadInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India. muhammad.iips@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-7038
Manacy PaiDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-3859
Waquar AhmedSchool of Health Systems Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
S AlthafNational Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala, 673601, India.
National Institute of Technology Calicut · INInternational Institute for Population Sciences · INKent State University · USTata Institute of Social Sciences · IN

Funding

Integrting Information About Aging SurveysR01AG030153 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Sara Adar, Alden L. Gross · 2007 to 2026
$41.7M
The Longitudinal Aging Study in IndiaR01AG042778 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AROKIASAMY, PERIANAYAGAM, BLOOM, DAVID E · 2013 to 2019
$9.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030153NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construct of intrinsic capacity (IC) in the context of integrated care for older adults emphasizes functional assessment from a holistic perspective. It provides reliable and comparable insights on subsequent functioning and disability. Given the paucity of research on IC and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the present study examined the association of IC with geriatric conditions of functional limitations and multiple fall outcomes among older adults in India. The data used for analysis come from the first wave of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), 2017-2018. The final sample size contains 24,136 older adults (11,871 males and 12,265 females) age 60 years or above. Multivariable binary logistic regression is employed to examine the association of IC and other explanatory factors with outcome variables of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), falls, fall injury, and multiple falls. Of the total sample, 24.56% of older adults were observed to be in the high IC category. The prevalence of ADL difficulty, IADL difficulty, falls, multiple falls and fall-related injury is estimated to be 19.89%, 45.00%, 12.36%, 5.49% and 5.57%, respectively. Older adults who reported high IC had a significantly lower prevalence of ADL difficulty (12.26% vs 22.38%) and IADL difficulty (31.13% vs 49.52%) than those who reported low IC. Similarly, a lower prevalence of falls (9.42% vs 13.34%), fall-related injury (4.10% vs 6.06%) and multiple falls (3.46% vs 6.16%) were reported among those who had high IC. After adjusting for a large number of confounders such as age, sex, health-related attributes and lifestyle behaviors, older adults with high IC had significantly lower odds of ADL difficulty [aOR: 0.63, CI: 0.52-0.76], IADL difficulty [aOR: 0.71, CI: 0.60-0.83], falls [aOR: 0.80, CI: 0.67-0.96], multiple falls [aOR: 0.73, CI: 0.58-0.96] and fall-related injury [aOR: 0.78, CI: 0.61-0.99]. That a high IC was independently associated with a lower risk of functional difficulty and fall outcomes in later life is of enormous value in predicting subsequent functional care needs. More specifically, the findings here imply that because regular IC monitoring can predict poor health outcomes in older adults, improvements in IC should be prioritized while formulating disability and fall prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPersons with DisabilitiesAgedAgingFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37330570
PMCPMC10276857
OpenAlexW4381094729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.