Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37330539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Diagnostic performance of calf circumference, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF for possible sarcopenia screening in Indonesia.

Stefanus G Kandinata, Novira Widajanti, Jusri Ichwani, Hadiq Firdausi, I G P S Aryana, Firas F Alkaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the Discriminative Performance of SARC-F and SARC-CalF in Identifying Functional Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefanus G KandinataFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Novira WidajantiDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital - Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo No 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia. novirawidajanti@fk.unair.ac.id.
Jusri IchwaniDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital - Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo No 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Hadiq FirdausiDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital - Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo No 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia.
I G P S AryanaDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Sanglah Teaching Hospital, Bali, Indonesia.
Firas F AlkaffDivision of Pharmacology and Therapy, Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo No 47, Surabaya, Indonesia. firasfarisialkaff@fk.unair.ac.id.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian working group for sarcopenia (AWGS) recently introduced "possible sarcopenia" diagnosis for early identification of sarcopenia in the primary healthcare. For initial screening, 3 modalities, i.e. calf circumference (CC) measurement, strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire, and a combination of both (SARC-CalF), are recommended. However, no validation study has been done until now. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the recommended screening modalities using data from Indonesia. This cross-sectional study included subjects aged ≥ 60 years old who visited primary healthcare in Surabaya, Indonesia. The diagnosis of possible sarcopenia was confirmed with hand-grip strength and repeated chair stand test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Among 266 subjects, 186 (70%) were diagnosed with possible sarcopenia. Using the recommended cut-off, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.511, 48.39% and 53.75% for CC, 0.543, 8.60% and 100% for SARC-F, and 0.572, 19.35% and 95% for SACRC-CalF. Our findings indicate that the diagnostic performance of the recommended screening modalities is poor. Multicenter studies from different areas in Indonesia should be done to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndonesiaLegMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37330539
PMCPMC10276820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.