Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37330517›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Predicting frictional aging from bulk relaxation measurements.

Kasra Farain, Daniel Bonn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kasra FarainVan der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-6064
Daniel BonnVan der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, Netherlands. d.bonn@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-1997

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 833240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coefficient of static friction between solids normally increases with the time they have remained in static contact before the measurement. This phenomenon, known as frictional aging, is at the origin of the difference between static and dynamic friction coefficients but has remained difficult to understand. It is usually attributed to a slow expansion of the area of atomic contact as the interface changes under pressure. This is however challenging to quantify as surfaces have roughness at all length scales. In addition, friction is not always proportional to the contact area. Here we show that the normalized stress relaxation of the surface asperities during frictional contact with a hard substrate is the same as that of the bulk material, regardless of the asperities' size or degree of compression. This result enables us to predict the frictional aging of rough interfaces based on the bulk material properties of two typical polymers: polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene.

Identifiers

PMID37330517
PMCPMC10276840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.