ArticleSleep health2023
Variation in Twitter posts referencing pediatric sleep aids.
Article in Sleep health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOver 50% of parents who use social media seek parenting advice, however little is known about social media discussions surrounding child sleep aid use. The current study investigated Twitter posts about the use of pediatric sleep aids (melatonin, cannabidiol, weighted blankets, and essential oils), including post frequency, user characteristics, and content. In addition, variation in tweets before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was examined.
methodsTwitter was searched over a 25-month period using TweetDeck. Tweets were coded for user characteristics (eg, affiliations, gender) and content (eg, tone, states sleep or health outcomes, reference to a neurodevelopmental condition).
resultsOf the 2754 tweets analyzed, melatonin was referenced most often (60%), followed by essential oils (23%), weighted blankets (14%), and cannabidiol (3%). Most were published by individual users (77%) and were positive (51%) in tone. About 1-third of tweets noted positive sleep or health effects of the sleep aid and only 7% referenced a neurodevelopmental condition. Tweets about pediatric sleep aids increased during the pandemic, primarily those posts about melatonin.
conclusionsMelatonin is the most commonly discussed sleep aid on Twitter, followed by essential oils. Tweets are primarily positive. The number of tweets about sleep aids, specifically melatonin, has increased with time, with significantly more tweets after the start of the pandemic. Clinicians should consider using this outlet to provide empirically-based information regarding the efficacy and benefits or risks of sleep aid use in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.