Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329640›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023

Measurement of relative motion of the brain and skull in the mini-pig in-vivo.

Keshav A Kailash, Charlotte A Guertler, Curtis L Johnson, Ruth J Okamoto, Philip V Bayly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keshav A KailashWashington University in St. Louis, Biomedical Engineering, United States.
Charlotte A GuertlerWashington University in St. Louis, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, United States.
Curtis L JohnsonUniversity of Delaware, Biomedical Engineering, United States.
Ruth J OkamotoWashington University in St. Louis, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, United States.
Philip V BaylyWashington University in St. Louis, Biomedical Engineering, United States; Washington University in St. Louis, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, United States. Electronic address: pvb@wustl.edu.

Funding

MRI Measurement of the Mechanical Vulnerability of the BrainU01NS112120 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
High-Resolution, Anisotropic MR Elastography of the BrainR01EB027577 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V, JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027577NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS112120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical role of the skull-brain interface is critical to the pathology of concussion and traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may evolve with age. Here we characterize the skull-brain interface in juvenile, female Yucatan mini-pigs from 3 to 6 months old using techniques from magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). The displacements of the skull and brain were measured by a motion-sensitive MR imaging sequence during low-amplitude harmonic motion of the head. Each animal was scanned four times at 1-month intervals. Harmonic motion at 100 Hz was excited by three different configurations of a jaw actuator in order to vary the direction of loading. Rigid-body linear motions of the brain and skull were similar, although brain rotations were consistently smaller than corresponding skull rotations. Relative displacements between the brain and skull were estimated for voxels on the surface of the brain. Amplitudes of relative displacements between skull and brain were 1-3 μm, approximately 25-50% of corresponding skull displacements. Maps of relative displacement showed variations by anatomical region, and the normal component of relative displacement was consistently 25-50% of the tangential component. These results illuminate the mechanics of the skull-brain interface in a gyrencephalic animal model relevant to human brain injury and development.

Indexed as

BrainElasticity Imaging TechniquesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHeadHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionSkullSwineSwine, MiniatureBrain biomechanicsBrain-skull interfaceMagnetic resonance elastographyMRI

Identifiers

PMID37329640
PMCPMC11086683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.