Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329443›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2023

Variation in hysterectomy prevalence and trends among U.S. States and Territories-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2020.

Sameer V Gopalani, Sabitha R Dasari, Emily E Adam, Trevor D Thompson, Mary C White, Mona Saraiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sameer V GopalaniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Sabitha R DasariCyberdata Technologies, Inc, Herndon, VA, 20170, USA.
Emily E AdamDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Trevor D ThompsonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Mary C WhiteDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Mona SaraiyaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA. msaraiya@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe estimated up-to-date state- and territory-level hysterectomy prevalence and trends, which can help correct the population at risk denominator and calculate more accurate uterine and cervical cancer rates.

methodsWe analyzed self-reported data for a population-based sample of 1,267,013 U.S. women aged ≥ 18 years who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 2012 to 2020. Estimates were age-standardized and stratified by sociodemographic characteristics and geography. Trends were assessed by testing for any differences in hysterectomy prevalence across years.

resultsHysterectomy prevalence was highest among women aged 70-79 years (46.7%) and ≥ 80 years (48.8%). Prevalence was also higher among women who were non-Hispanic (NH) Black (21.3%), NH American Indian and Alaska Native (21.1%), and from the South (21.1%). Hysterectomy prevalence declined by 1.9 percentage points from 18.9% in 2012 to 17.0% in 2020.

conclusionsApproximately one in five U.S. women overall and half of U.S. women aged ≥ 70 years reported undergoing a hysterectomy. Our findings reveal large variations in hysterectomy prevalence within and between each of the four census regions and by race and other sociodemographic characteristics, underscoring the importance of adjusting epidemiologic measures of uterine and cervical cancers for hysterectomy status.

Indexed as

HysterectomyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemEthnicityFemaleHumansPrevalenceUnited StatesBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemCervical cancerHysterectomyPrevalenceUterine cancerWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID37329443
PMCPMC10643045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.