Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329433›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Improving the quality of life of parents of patients with congenital abnormalities using psychoeducational interventions: a systematic review.

Marisa Garcia Rodrigues, José Daniel Rodrigues, Matilde Monteiro Soares, Luís Filipe Azevedo, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, José Carlos Areias, Maria Emília Areias

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Psychological Support in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Parental Perspective.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marisa Garcia RodriguesCentro Hospitalar Universitário São João (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal. marisaigrodrigues@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-8044
José Daniel RodriguesCentro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-7959
Matilde Monteiro SoaresCentro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-2910
Luís Filipe AzevedoCentro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8421-2937
Pedro Pereira RodriguesCentro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-6682
José Carlos AreiasUnidade de Investigação Cardiovascular da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (UnIC), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9833-2518
Maria Emília AreiasUnidade de Investigação Cardiovascular da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (UnIC), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-0417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify psychoeducational interventions that target parents of children with congenital abnormalities (CA) and evaluate their impact on quality of life (QoL).

methodsThe search was conducted in six electronic databases, complemented by references of the studies found, studies of evidence synthesis, a manual search of relevant scientific meetings' abstracts and contact with experts. We included primary studies on parents of children with CA that studied psychoeducational interventions versus standard care. We assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

resultsWe included six studies focusing on congenital heart defects (CHD). They described four different psychoeducational strategies. In four studies, statistically significant differences were found. For clinical practice, we considered three interventions as more feasible: the Educational program for mothers, with a group format of four sessions weekly; CHIP-Family intervention, which includes a parental group workshop followed by an individual follow-up booster session; and WeChat educational health program with an online format.

conclusionsThis review is the first that assesses the impact of psychoeducational interventions targeted at parents of children with CA on their QoL. The best approach to intervention is multiple group sessions. Two essential strategies were to give support material, enabling parents to review, and the possibility of an online program application, increasing accessibility. However, because all included studies focus on CHD, generalizations should be made carefully. These findings are crucial to guide future research to promote and improve comprehensive and structured support for families and integrate them into daily practice.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalQuality of LifeChildFemaleHumansMothersParentsChildrenCongenital abnormalitiesCongenital heart defectsParentsPsychoeducational interventionsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID37329433
PMCPMC10522751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.