ReviewJournal of religion and health2023
How Coronavirus Restrictions Adopted by Governments Affected World Religious Groups: A Review.
Review in Journal of religion and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The next viral pandemic-where do we stand?Folia microbiologica · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic has significantly affected the operation of the world's faith communities. The first reaction of different confessions to the introduction of corresponding restrictive measures was quite variable-it ranged from understanding and assisting the authorities to disobedience and deliberate violation of the quarantine regime. Today, religious precepts, values, and attitudes continue to exert an enormous influence on the behavioral patterns and public perception of the imposed COVID-19-related restrictions. In light of this, the present article aimed to study the effect of COVID-19 on religious communities' response to the pandemic progress to determine what tools of public influence can be used by secular authorities and religious leaders to counter the global viral threats. To achieve this goal, faith communities' reactions to restrictive measures adopted by the governments in relation to religious services and gatherings were analyzed. The study findings suggest that information campaigns launched by the secular authorities to prevent COVID-19 spread cannot offset the need for collective worshipping for a long time even under the possibility of being infected. Notwithstanding the fact that most modern world countries are secular and realize the freedom of religion or belief, this study calls for further discussion on the feasibility of additional regulations for religious communities in the context of the virus's active transmission. Along with this, it puts forward an offer for religious leaders to conduct more comprehensive explanatory work with believers concerning the pandemic issues from the perspective of religious dogmas. The research question concerns a review of academic research regarding the assessment of how secular authorities interacted with religious authorities in the context of the most common religions and churches and how much this changed the behavior of believers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37329377What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.