Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329360›Full record

ArticleInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2023

Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation.

Elisabeth Seebach, Franziska V Kraus, Tabea Elschner, Katharina F Kubatzky

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. DNA corona on nanoparticles leads to an enhanced immunostimulatory effect with implications for autoimmune diseases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Virulence · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth SeebachDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. elisabeth.seebach@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Franziska V KrausDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tabea ElschnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina F KubatzkyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. kubatzky@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9329
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe pathophysiology of chronic implant-related bone infections is characterized by an increase in osteoclast numbers and enhanced bone resorption. Biofilms are a major reason for chronicity of such infections as the biofilm matrix protects bacteria against antibiotics and impairs the function of immune cells. Macrophages are osteoclast precursor cells and therefore linked to inflammation and bone destruction. OBJECTIVE AND

methodInvestigations on the impact of biofilms on the ability of macrophages to form osteoclasts are yet missing and we, therefore, analyzed the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) planktonic and biofilm environments on osteoclastogenesis using RAW 264.7 cells and conditioned media (CM).

resultsPriming with the osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL before CM addition enabled the cells to differentiate into osteoclasts. This effect was highest in SE planktonic or SA biofilm CM. Simultaneous stimulation with CM and RANKL, however, suppressed osteoclast formation and resulted in formation of inflammation-associated multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) which was most pronounced in SE planktonic CM.

conclusionOur data indicate that the biofilm environment and its high lactate levels are not actively promoting osteoclastogenesis. Hence, the inflammatory immune response against planktonic bacterial factors through Toll-like receptors seems to be the central cause for the pathological osteoclast formation. Therefore, immune stimulation or approaches that aim at biofilm disruption need to consider that this might result in enhanced inflammation-mediated bone destruction.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionOsteoclastsBiofilmsHumansInflammationPlanktonRANK LigandStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusRANK LigandBiofilmImmune responseImplant-related bone infectionsMacrophagesOsteoclastogenesisStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID37329360
PMCPMC10352167
OpenAlexW4381053258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.