SynthesisCA: a cancer journal for clinicians
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.
Synthesis in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Trial
- Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men not Attending a Population-based Screening Program: The 'Good', the 'Bad', and the 'Ugly' After 20-yr Follow-up in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Increased risks of type II diabetes among older Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander lung cancer survivors: a SEER-Medicare analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- SNAP Participation and Cancer Screening for Adults With Food Insecurity.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Association of Patient and Neighborhood Factors With Lung Cancer Screening Rates in Minnesota.CHEST pulmonary · 2026Article
- Understanding Public Perceptions of Lung Cancer in China: Infodemiology Study of Baidu Index and Weibo Posts.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Health-Related Social Needs in a National Sample of US Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Social determinants of health, behavioral factors, and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Residential segregation and late-stage colorectal cancer in the United States: a population-based study of 1.2 million adults.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- A study of the associations between social isolation and loneliness with sex-specific cancer risk in the UK Biobank.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluating the association between upstream perceived individual and neighborhood determinants of health and intensity of breast cancer screening.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Beyond Knowledge: Trust and the Engagement of Newly Arrived Refugee Women in Cervical Cancer Prevention.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Health-Related Social Needs and Cervical Cancer Screening in Alliance Chicago Community Health Centers.AJPM focus · 2026Article
- Telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Outcomes Among Patients With Colon Cancer Living in Neighborhoods With Persistent Poverty.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor: "Mediation effect of healthy lifestyles on the association of socioeconomic status with mortality among US cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- County-level social, preventive care, and behavioral correlates of colorectal cancer mortality in the United States: a nationwide ecological analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Who is more likely to receive up-to-date lung cancer screening? Identifying key barriers using principal component analysis and SHAP modeling: a weighted cross-sectional analysis of the 2024 BRFSS.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There remains a need to synthesize linkages between social determinants of health (SDOH) and cancer screening to reduce persistent inequities contributing to the US cancer burden. The authors conducted a systematic review of US-based breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening intervention studies to summarize how SDOH have been considered in interventions and relationships between SDOH and screening. Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed research articles published in English between 2010 and 2021. The Covidence software platform was used to screen articles and extract data using a standardized template. Data items included study and intervention characteristics, SDOH intervention components and measures, and screening outcomes. The findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and narratives. The review included 144 studies among diverse population groups. SDOH interventions increased screening rates overall by a median of 8.4 percentage points (interquartile interval, 1.8-18.8 percentage points). The objective of most interventions was to increase community demand (90.3%) and access (84.0%) to screening. SDOH interventions related to health care access and quality were most prevalent (227 unique intervention components). Other SDOH, including educational, social/community, environmental, and economic factors, were less common (90, 52, 21, and zero intervention components, respectively). Studies that included analyses of health policy, access to care, and lower costs yielded the largest proportions of favorable associations with screening outcomes. SDOH were predominantly measured at the individual level. This review describes how SDOH have been considered in the design and evaluation of cancer screening interventions and effect sizes for SDOH interventions. Findings may guide future intervention and implementation research aiming to reduce US screening inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.