Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329026›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2023

Optimal policies for Bayesian olfactory search in turbulent flows.

R A Heinonen, L Biferale, A Celani, M Vergassola

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Smart active particles learn and transcend bacterial foraging strategies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Olfactory search with finite-state controllers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

R A HeinonenDepartment of Physics and INFN, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
L BiferaleDepartment of Physics and INFN, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
A CelaniQuantitative Life Sciences, Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, 34151 Trieste, Italy.
M VergassolaLaboratoire de Physique, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, PSL Research University, Sorbonne University, 75005 Paris, France.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) · IT

Funding

Odor trail tracking: a new paradigm to unveil algorithms and neural circuits underlying active sensation and continuous decision makingRF1NS128865 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DULAC, CATHERINE, MURTHY, VENKATESH N · 2022 to 2022
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS128865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many practical scenarios, a flying insect must search for the source of an emitted cue which is advected by the atmospheric wind. On the macroscopic scales of interest, turbulence tends to mix the cue into patches of relatively high concentration over a background of very low concentration, so that the insect will detect the cue only intermittently and cannot rely on chemotactic strategies which simply climb the concentration gradient. In this work we cast this search problem in the language of a partially observable Markov decision process and use the Perseus algorithm to compute strategies that are near-optimal with respect to the arrival time. We test the computed strategies on a large two-dimensional grid, present the resulting trajectories and arrival time statistics, and compare these to the corresponding results for several heuristic strategies, including (space-aware) infotaxis, Thompson sampling, and QMDP. We find that the near-optimal policy found by our implementation of Perseus outperforms all heuristics we test by several measures. We use the near-optimal policy to study how the search difficulty depends on the starting location. We also discuss the choice of initial belief and the robustness of the policies to changes in the environment. Finally, we present a detailed and pedagogical discussion about the implementation of the Perseus algorithm, including the benefits-and pitfalls-of employing a reward-shaping function.

Identifiers

PMID37329026
PMCPMC12165250
OpenAlexW4376640537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.