ArticlePhysical review. E2023
Optimal policies for Bayesian olfactory search in turbulent flows.
Article in Physical review. E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- TURB-Smoke. A database of Lagrangian pollutants emitted from point sources in turbulent flows with a mean wind.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
- Optimal trajectories for Bayesian olfactory search in turbulent flows: The low information limit and beyond.Physical review fluids · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantifying spectral information about source separation in multisource odour plumes.PloS one · 2025Article
- Smart active particles learn and transcend bacterial foraging strategies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Adaptive Space-Aware Infotaxis II as a Strategy for Odor Source Localization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Olfactory search with finite-state controllers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In many practical scenarios, a flying insect must search for the source of an emitted cue which is advected by the atmospheric wind. On the macroscopic scales of interest, turbulence tends to mix the cue into patches of relatively high concentration over a background of very low concentration, so that the insect will detect the cue only intermittently and cannot rely on chemotactic strategies which simply climb the concentration gradient. In this work we cast this search problem in the language of a partially observable Markov decision process and use the Perseus algorithm to compute strategies that are near-optimal with respect to the arrival time. We test the computed strategies on a large two-dimensional grid, present the resulting trajectories and arrival time statistics, and compare these to the corresponding results for several heuristic strategies, including (space-aware) infotaxis, Thompson sampling, and QMDP. We find that the near-optimal policy found by our implementation of Perseus outperforms all heuristics we test by several measures. We use the near-optimal policy to study how the search difficulty depends on the starting location. We also discuss the choice of initial belief and the robustness of the policies to changes in the environment. Finally, we present a detailed and pedagogical discussion about the implementation of the Perseus algorithm, including the benefits-and pitfalls-of employing a reward-shaping function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.