ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2023
On weighted k-mer dictionaries.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioSet2Vec: extraction of k-mer dictionaries from multiple sets of biological sequences via big data technologies.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- The open-closed mod-minimizer algorithm.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025Article
- Heuristics for the run-length encoded Burrows-Wheeler transform alphabet ordering problem.Journal of heuristics · 2025Article
- The backpack quotient filter: A dynamic and space-efficient data structure for queryingiScience · 2024Article
- When less is more: sketching with minimizers in genomics.Genome biology · 2024Review
- Where the Patterns Are: Repetition-Aware Compression for Colored de Bruijn GraphsJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We consider the problem of representing a set of [Formula: see text]-mers and their abundance counts, or weights, in compressed space so that assessing membership and retrieving the weight of a [Formula: see text]-mer is efficient. The representation is called a weighted dictionary of [Formula: see text]-mers and finds application in numerous tasks in Bioinformatics that usually count [Formula: see text]-mers as a pre-processing step. In fact, [Formula: see text]-mer counting tools produce very large outputs that may result in a severe bottleneck for subsequent processing. In this work we extend the recently introduced SSHash dictionary (Pibiri in Bioinformatics 38:185-194, 2022) to also store compactly the weights of the [Formula: see text]-mers. From a technical perspective, we exploit the order of the [Formula: see text]-mers represented in SSHash to encode runs of weights, hence allowing much better compression than the empirical entropy of the weights. We study the problem of reducing the number of runs in the weights to improve compression even further and give an optimal algorithm for this problem. Lastly, we corroborate our findings with experiments on real-world datasets and comparison with competitive alternatives. Up to date, SSHash is the only [Formula: see text]-mer dictionary that is exact, weighted, associative, fast, and small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.