Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328817›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Efficacy of bi-level erector spinae plane block versus bi-level thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Domenico P Santonastaso, Annabella de Chiara, Roberto Righetti, Diego Marandola, Andrea Sica, Claude T Bagaphou, Chiara Rosato, Andrea Tognù, Annalisa Curcio, Leonardo Lucchi and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04457115 (Comparison of Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Intra and Postoperative Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04457115 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Intra and Postoperative Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAUSL Romagna RiminiRan2020 to 2021Enrolled78ConditionsBreast Surgery, Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Post-operative Pain Control, Erector Spinae Plane BlockArmsThoracic paravertebral block, Erector spinae plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practical Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Domenico P SantonastasoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy. domenicopietro.santonastaso@auslromagna.it.
Annabella de ChiaraAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Roberto RighettiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Viale Randi 5, 48121, Ravenna, Italy.
Diego MarandolaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Andrea SicaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Claude T BagaphouSection of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Ospedale Di Città Di Castello - USL Umbria1, Città Di Castello, Perugia, Italy.
Chiara RosatoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Andrea TognùSection of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Ospedale Mazzolani Vandini, Via Nazionale Ponente, 7, 44011, Argenta, Italy.
Annalisa CurcioGeneral Surgery Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Viale Randi 5, 48121, Ravenna, Italy.
Leonardo LucchiDay Surgery - Breast Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti, 286-47521, Cesena, FC, Italy.
Emanuele RussoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Vanni AgnolettiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M.Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286-47521, Cesena, Italy.
Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITCittà di Castello Hospital · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative analgesia in breast surgery is difficult due to the extensive nature of the surgery and the complex innervation of the breast; general anesthesia can be associated with regional anesthesia techniques to control intra- and post-postoperative pain. This randomized comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block and the thoracic paravertebral block in radical mastectomy procedures with or without axillary emptying.

methodsThis prospective randomized comparative study included 82 adult females who were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated random number. Both groups, Thoracic Paraverterbal block group and Erector Spinae Plane Block group (41 patients each), received general anesthesia associated with a multilevel single-shot thoracic paravertebral block and a multilevel single-shot erector spinae plane block, respectively. Postoperative pain intensity (expressed as Numeric Rating Scale), patients who needed rescue analgesic, intra- and post-operative opioid consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, adverse events, chronic pain at 6 months, and the patient's satisfaction were recorded.

resultsAt 2 h (p < 0.001) and 6 h (p = 0.012) the Numeric Rating Scale was significantly lower in Thoracic Paraverterbal block group. The Numeric Rating Scale at 12, 24, and 36 postoperative hours did not show significant differences. There were no significant differences also in the number of patients requiring rescue doses of NSAIDs, in intra- and post-operative opioid consumption, in post-operative nausea and vomiting episodes and in the length of stay. No failures or complications occurred in the execution of techniques and none of the patients reported any chronic pain at six months from the surgery.

conclusionsBoth thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block can be effectively used in controlling post-mastectomy pain with no significant differences between the two blocks.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT04457115) (first registration 27/04/2020).

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBreast NeoplasmsChronic PainNerve BlockAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, Modified RadicalPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesics, OpioidBreast surgeryErector spinae plane blockMastectomyPostoperative painThoracic paravertebral block

Identifiers

PMID37328817
PMCPMC10273752
OpenAlexW4380990445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.