Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328764›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

Development of a predictive model for identifying women vulnerable to HIV in Chicago.

Eleanor E Friedman, Shivanjali Shankaran, Samantha A Devlin, Ekta B Kishen, Joseph A Mason, Beverly E Sha, Jessica P Ridgway

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor E FriedmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. efriedman@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Shivanjali ShankaranRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Samantha A DevlinDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Ekta B KishenRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joseph A MasonDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Beverly E ShaRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessica P RidgwayDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

The Institute for Translational MedicineUL1TR002389 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Joshua J Jacobs, DAVID O MELTZER · 2017 to 2026
$71.6M
Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearchers in the United States have created several models to predict persons most at risk for HIV. Many of these predictive models use data from all persons newly diagnosed with HIV, the majority of whom are men, and specifically men who have sex with men (MSM). Consequently, risk factors identified by these models are biased toward features that apply only to men or capture sexual behaviours of MSM. We sought to create a predictive model for women using cohort data from two major hospitals in Chicago with large opt-out HIV screening programs.

methodsWe matched 48 newly diagnosed women to 192 HIV-negative women based on number of previous encounters at University of Chicago or Rush University hospitals. We examined data for each woman for the two years prior to either their HIV diagnosis or their last encounter. We assessed risk factors including demographic characteristics and clinical diagnoses taken from patient electronic medical records (EMR) using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We created a multivariable logistic regression model and measured predictive power with the area under the curve (AUC). In the multivariable model, age group, race, and ethnicity were included a priori due to increased risk for HIV among specific demographic groups.

resultsThe following clinical diagnoses were significant at the bivariate level and were included in the model: pregnancy (OR 1.96 (1.00, 3.84)), hepatitis C (OR 5.73 (1.24, 26.51)), substance use (OR 3.12 (1.12, 8.65)) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or syphilis. We also a priori included demographic factors that are associated with HIV. Our final model had an AUC of 0.74 and included healthcare site, age group, race, ethnicity, pregnancy, hepatitis C, substance use, and STI diagnosis.

conclusionsOur predictive model showed acceptable discrimination between those who were and were not newly diagnosed with HIV. We identified risk factors such as recent pregnancy, recent hepatitis C diagnosis, and substance use in addition to the traditionally used recent STI diagnosis that can be incorporated by health systems to detect women who are vulnerable to HIV and would benefit from preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesChicagoFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleElectronic Medical Record (EMR)HIVHIV vulnerabilityPrediction modelPrEPRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37328764
PMCPMC10276380
OpenAlexW4380991350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.