Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328699›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Implications of the COVID19 pandemic on the need and timing of second transurethral bladder tumour resection in high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Matthias Vanneste, Bart van der Heij, Charlotte Elisabeth Christiaansen, Chris L Berendsen, Elisabeth Johanna Margaretha Driessen, Harman Maxim Bruins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias VannesteDepartment of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dunantlaan 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands. m.vanneste@zuyderland.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-8706
Bart van der HeijDepartment of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dunantlaan 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Charlotte Elisabeth ChristiaansenDepartment of Urology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Chris L BerendsenDepartment of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dunantlaan 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth Johanna Margaretha DriessenDepartment of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dunantlaan 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Harman Maxim BruinsDepartment of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dunantlaan 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to the COVID19 pandemic, the EAU has recommended to, if needed, postpone second transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) after BCG induction in selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes of postponed TURBT and the potential to replace second TURBT by routine cystoscopy and cytology.

methodsA single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with TaG3/high grade (HG) or T1HG urothelial bladder cancer was performed. All patients underwent a complete TURBT between 2000 and 2013 with presence of detrusor muscle, full BCG induction and routine cystoscopy and cytology, followed by a second TURBT. Results of the cystoscopy, cytology and pathology reports of the TURBT were analyzed by descriptive characteristics, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, as well as survival analyses.

results112 patients were included. Residual tumour was present at second TURBT in 21.4%. Upstaging rate from pTaHG to pT1HG and pT1HG to pT2 was 0% and 2.7%, respectively. pT0 was confirmed in 79% of patients, but in 98% of patients with combined negative cytology and cystoscopy after BCG. With a median follow-up of 109 months, the 3-year OS was 85%, RFS 74% and PFS 89%. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of cystoscopy and urinary cytology for the presence of residual tumour were 92%, 97%, 98% and 85%, respectively.

conclusionThis study underpins the recommendation of the EAU NMIBC guideline panel that, if needed and in selected patients, second TURBT may be postponed until after BCG induction treatment in pT1HG disease. Also, routine second TURBT can be omitted in pTaHG disease. Data on replacing second TURBT after BCG treatment by routine cystoscopy and cytology appear promising but require further confirmation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBCG VaccineCystoscopyHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPandemicsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBCG VaccineBladder cancerCOVID19CystoscopyCytologyIntravesical bladder instillationsSecond transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT)

Identifiers

PMID37328699
OpenAlexW4381046863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.