Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328636›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Appropriateness of end-of-life care for children with genetic and congenital conditions: a cohort study using routinely collected linked data.

Veerle Piette, Luc Deliens, Sara Debulpaep, Joachim Cohen, Kim Beernaert

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veerle PietteEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-5248
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium. luc.deliens@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8158-2422
Sara DebulpaepDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-1578
Joachim Cohen *End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-9476
Kim Beernaert *End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-3977
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek No grant number providedWetenschappelijk Fonds Willy Gepts No grant number provided
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the appropriateness of end-of-life care for children with genetic and congenital conditions. This is a decedent cohort study. We used 6 linked, Belgian, routinely collected, population-level databases containing children (1-17) who died with genetic and congenital conditions in Belgium between 2010 and 2017. We measured 22 quality indicators, face-validated using a previously published RAND/UCLA methodology. Appropriateness of care was defined as the overall "expected health benefit" of given healthcare interventions within a healthcare system exceeding expected negative outcomes. In the 8-year study period, 200 children were identified to have died with genetic and congenital conditions. Concerning appropriateness of care, in the last month before death, 79% of children had contact with specialist physicians, 17% had contact with a family physician, and 5% received multidisciplinary care. Palliative care was used by 17% of the children. Concerning inappropriateness of care, 51% of the children received blood drawings in the last week before death, and 29% received diagnostics and monitoring (2 or more magnetic resonance imaging scans, computed tomography scans, or X-rays) in the last month.    Conclusion: Findings suggest end-of-life care could be improved in terms of palliative care, contact with a family physician and paramedics, and diagnostics and monitoring in the form of imaging. What is Known: • Previous studies suggest that end-of life care for children with genetic and congenital conditions may be subject to issues with bereavement, psychological concerns for child and family, financial cost at the end of life, decision-making when using technological interventions, availability and coordination of services, and palliative care provision. Bereaved parents of children with genetic and congenital conditions have previously evaluated end-of-life care as poor or fair, and some have reported that their children suffered a lot to a great deal at the end of life. • However, no peer-reviewed population-level quality evaluation of end-of-life care for this population is currently present. What is New: • This study provides an evaluation of the appropriateness of end-of-life care for children who died in Belgium with genetic and congenital conditions between 2010 and 2017, using administrative healthcare data and validated quality indicators. The concept of appropriateness is denoted as relative and indicative within the study, not as a definitive judgement. • Our study suggests improvements in end-of-life care may be possible, for instance, in terms of the provision of palliative care, contact with care providers next to the specialist physician, and diagnostics and monitoring in terms of imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans). Further empirical research is necessary, for instance, into unforeseen and foreseen end-of-life trajectories, to make definitive conclusions about appropriateness of care.

Indexed as

Semantic WebTerminal CareChildCohort StudiesDeathHumansPalliative CareCongenital conditionsEnd of lifeGenetic conditionsPalliative carePediatricsQuality indicators

Identifiers

PMID37328636
OpenAlexW4380881359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.