Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328607›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

A proposed FAIR approach for disseminating geospatial information system maps.

P Travis Thompson, Sweta Ojha, Christian D Powell, Kelly G Pennell, Hunter N B Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Order from entropy: big data from FAIR data cohorts in the digital age of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P Travis ThompsonUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, KY, USA.
Sweta OjhaUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, KY, USA.
Christian D PowellUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, KY, USA.
Kelly G PennellUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3423-9610
Hunter N B MoseleyUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, KY, USA. hunter.moseley@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-5368

Funding

Vascular Mechanisms of PCB-Induced Brain MetastasesP42ES007380 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PENNELL, KELLY G · 1997 to 2024
$47.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a draft Minimum Information About Geospatial Information System (MIAGIS) standard for facilitating public deposition of geospatial information system (GIS) datasets that follows the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles. The draft MIAGIS standard includes a deposition directory structure and a minimum javascript object notation (JSON) metadata formatted file that is designed to capture critical metadata describing GIS layers and maps as well as their sources of data and methods of generation. The associated miagis Python package facilitates the creation of this MIAGIS metadata file and directly supports metadata extraction from both Esri JSON and GEOJSON GIS data formats plus options for extraction from user-specified JSON formats. We also demonstrate their use in crafting two example depositions of ArcGIS generated maps. We hope this draft MIAGIS standard along with the supporting miagis Python package will assist in establishing a GIS standards group that will develop the draft into a full standard for the wider GIS community as well as a future public repository for GIS datasets.

Indexed as

Information SystemsMetadata

Identifiers

PMID37328607
PMCPMC10275873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.