Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Using DUCK-Net for polyp image segmentation.

Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru, Darius Peteleaza, Catalin Craciun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hard exudates in diabetic macular edema after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the DRCR protocol T trial.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Lung nodule segmentation method based on multiscale feature interaction and coordinate information].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CAFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ColonNeXt: Fully Convolutional Attention for Polyp Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru, Sibiu, Romania.
Darius Peteleaza, Sibiu, Romania. peteleaza.darius@gmail.com.
Catalin Craciun, Medias, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a novel supervised convolutional neural network architecture, "DUCK-Net", capable of effectively learning and generalizing from small amounts of medical images to perform accurate segmentation tasks. Our model utilizes an encoder-decoder structure with a residual downsampling mechanism and a custom convolutional block to capture and process image information at multiple resolutions in the encoder segment. We employ data augmentation techniques to enrich the training set, thus increasing our model's performance. While our architecture is versatile and applicable to various segmentation tasks, in this study, we demonstrate its capabilities specifically for polyp segmentation in colonoscopy images. We evaluate the performance of our method on several popular benchmark datasets for polyp segmentation, Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-ColonDB, and ETIS-LARIBPOLYPDB showing that it achieves state-of-the-art results in terms of mean Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, Precision, Recall, and Accuracy. Our approach demonstrates strong generalization capabilities, achieving excellent performance even with limited training data.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingPolypsColonoscopyCultureGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLearning

Identifiers

PMID37328572
PMCPMC10276013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.