Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328511›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2023

Average power and burst analysis revealed complementary information on drug-related changes of motor performance in Parkinson's disease.

Flavie Torrecillos, Shenghong He, Andrea A Kühn, Huiling Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Flavie TorrecillosMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Shenghong HeMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea A KühnDepartment of Neurology, Charitè, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-9060
Huiling TanMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. huiling.tan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8038-3029

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/2Medical Research Council MR/V00655X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), suppression of beta and increase in gamma oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) have been associated with both levodopa treatment and motor functions. Recent results suggest that modulation of the temporal dynamics of theses oscillations (bursting activity) might contain more information about pathological states and behaviour than their average power. Here we directly compared the information provided by power and burst analyses about the drug-related changes in STN activities and their impact on motor performance within PD patients. STN local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded from externalized patients performing self-paced movements ON and OFF levodopa. When normalised across medication states, both power and burst analyses showed an increase in low-beta oscillations in the dopamine-depleted state during rest. When normalised within-medication state, both analyses revealed that levodopa increased movement-related modulation in the alpha and low-gamma bands, with higher gamma activity around movement predicting faster reaches. Finally, burst analyses helped to reveal opposite drug-related changes in low- and high-beta frequency bands, and identified additional within-patient relationships between high-beta bursting and movement performance. Our findings suggest that although power and burst analyses share a lot in common they also provide complementary information on how STN-LFP activity is associated with motor performance, and how levodopa treatment may modify these relationships in a way that helps explain drug-related changes in motor performance. Different ways of normalisation in the power analysis can reveal different information. Similarly, the burst analysis is sensitive to how the threshold is defined - either for separate medication conditions separately, or across pooled conditions. In addition, the burst interpretation has far-reaching implications about the nature of neural oscillations - whether the oscillations happen as isolated burst-events or are they sustained phenomena with dynamic amplitude variations? This can be different for different frequency bands, and different for different medication states even for the same frequency band.

Identifiers

PMID37328511
PMCPMC10275865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.