Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328497›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2023

Rapid analysis of meat floss origin using a supervised machine learning-based electronic nose towards food authentication.

Linda Ardita Putri, Iman Rahman, Mayumi Puspita, Shidiq Nur Hidayat, Agus Budi Dharmawan, Aditya Rianjanu, Sunu Wibirama, Roto Roto, Kuwat Triyana, Hutomo Suryo Wasisto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Ardita PutriPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5798-2268
Iman RahmanPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6766-5284
Mayumi PuspitaPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.
Shidiq Nur HidayatPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-9783
Agus Budi DharmawanPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.
Aditya RianjanuDepartment of Materials Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Terusan Ryacudu, Way Hui, Jati Agung, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7852-3619
Sunu WibiramaDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika 2, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.
Roto RotoDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara PO Box BLS 21, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.
Kuwat TriyanaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara PO Box BLS 21, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia. triyana@ugm.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-4364
Hutomo Suryo WasistoPT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 55167, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-3625
Universitas Gadjah Mada · IDSumatera Institute of Technology · IDTarumanagara University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Authentication of meat floss origin has been highly critical for its consumers due to existing potential risks of having allergic diseases or religion perspective related to pork-containing foods. Herein, we developed and assessed a compact portable electronic nose (e-nose) comprising gas sensor array and supervised machine learning with a window time slicing method to sniff and to classify different meat floss products. We evaluated four different supervised learning methods for data classification (i.e., linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and random forest (RF)). Among them, an LDA model equipped with five-window-extracted feature yielded the highest accuracy values of >99% for both validation and testing data in discriminating beef, chicken, and pork flosses. The obtained e-nose results were correlated and confirmed with the spectral data from Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) measurements. We found that beef and chicken had similar compound groups (i.e., hydrocarbons and alcohol). Meanwhile, aldehyde compounds (e.g., dodecanal and 9-octadecanal) were found to be dominant in pork products. Based on its performance evaluation, the developed e-nose system shows promising results in food authenticity testing, which paves the way for ubiquitously detecting deception and food fraud attempts.

Identifiers

PMID37328497
PMCPMC10275922
OpenAlexW4380992805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.