Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328434›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2023

Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.

Mats Brännström, Catherine Racowsky, Marie Carbonnel, Joseph Wu, Antonio Gargiulo, Eli Y Adashi, Jean Marc Ayoubi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Uterus transplantation: an ethical analysis.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anesthesia for uterine transplantation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mats BrännströmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-9101
Catherine RacowskyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-7896
Marie CarbonnelDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-1203
Joseph WuWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8028-8080
Antonio GargiuloDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-5412
Eli Y AdashiDepartment of Medical Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-1192
Jean Marc AyoubiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5951-2391
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRStockholm IVF · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleAnimalsChildEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLive BirthLiving DonorsPregnancyUterusanimal modelsassisted reproductionethicshumaninfertilityIVFsurgerytransplantationuterine factor infertilityuterus

Identifiers

PMID37328434
PMCPMC10477946
OpenAlexW4380873132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.