ReviewHuman reproduction update2023
Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.
Review in Human reproduction update, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes of live births after uterus transplantation: A systematic review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Pooled it
- Uterus transplantation: an ethical analysis.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Review
- The Transformative Journey of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Restoration of Reproductive Function in Uterine Factor Infertility: Clinical Evaluation of Uterus Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Is There an Increasing Interest in Vascular Composite Allotransplantation? A Search Trends Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Beyond montreal: a critical evaluation of the Montreal Criteria for uterine transplantation.Monash bioethics review · 2026Article
- Exploring donor-derived cell-free DNA as a rejection biomarker during uterus transplant follow up.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic uterine transposition and reposition in a patient with rectal cancer: complete case report and surgical perspective.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Second report of registry of the International Society of Uterus Transplantation (ISUTx): international activities 2000-2024.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Anesthetic challenges of the first successful living-donor uterus transplantation in Latin America: a case report.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Surgical approaches to fertility preservation in the cancer patient: current and future directions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Anesthesia for uterine transplantation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Review
- A review of immunosuppressive therapy in the context of uterine VCA and pregnancy.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Uterine Transplantation for Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility: From Bench to Bedside.Cureus · 2025Review
- Robotic uterine transposition for fertility preservation in a patient undergoing pelvic radiation: a case report and surgical perspective.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Uterus transplantation; first data on neurologic, neuropsychiatric, and physical examination follow-up of children up to 6 years of age.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Observational
- New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Article
- Transgender men as uterus donors for transplantation: A theoretical perspective.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Survey on the Public Opinion and Attitudes Toward Uterus Transplantation in Hungary.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.