Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328185›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2023

Examination of the demographic representativeness of a cross-sectional mobile phone survey in collecting health data in Colombia using random digit dialling.

Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla, Andres I Vecino-Ortiz, Angélica Torres-Quintero, Camila Solorzano-Barrera, Joseph Ali, Rolando Enrique Peñaloza-Quintero, Saifuddin Ahmed, George W Pariyo, Vidhi Maniar, Dustin G Gibson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deivis Nicolas Guzman-TordecillaDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA deivy-gt@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-7056
Andres I Vecino-OrtizDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Angélica Torres-QuinteroInstitute of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9577-6415
Camila Solorzano-BarreraInstitute of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-906X
Joseph AliBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rolando Enrique Peñaloza-QuinteroInstitute of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.
Saifuddin AhmedPopulation, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
George W PariyoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vidhi ManiarInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dustin G GibsonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-3376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs mobile phone ownership becomes more widespread in low-income and middle-income countries, mobile phone surveys (MPSs) present an opportunity to collect data on health more cost-effectively. However, selectivity and coverage biases in MPS are concerns, and there is limited information about the population-level representativeness of these surveys compared with household surveys. This study aims at comparing the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents of an MPS on non-communicable disease risk factors to a household survey in Colombia.

designCross-sectional study. We used a random digit dialling method to select the samples for calling mobile phone numbers. The survey was conducted using two modalities: computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) and interactive voice response (IVR). The participants were assigned randomly to one of the survey modalities based on a targeted sampling quota stratified by age and sex. The Quality-of-Life Survey (ECV), a nationally representative survey conducted in the same year of the MPS, was used as a reference to compare the sample distributions by sociodemographic characteristics of the MPS data. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the population representativeness between the ECV and the MPSs.

settingThe study was conducted in Colombia in 2021.

participantsPopulation at least 18 years old with a mobile phone.

resultsWe completed 1926 and 2983 interviews for CATI and IVR, respectively. We found that the MPS data have a similar (within 10% points) age-sex data distribution compared with the ECV dataset for some subpopulations, mainly for young populations, people with none/primary and secondary education levels, and people who live in urban and rural areas.

conclusionsThis study shows that MPS could collect similar data to household surveys in terms of age, sex, high school education level and geographical area for some population categories. Strategies are needed to improve representativeness of the under-represented groups.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdolescentAge DistributionColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth SurveysHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth informaticsLatin AmericaPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37328185
PMCPMC10277114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.