ArticleChemical research in toxicology2023
Leveraging Cell Painting Images to Expand the Applicability Domain and Actively Improve Deep Learning Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large scale compound selection guided by cell painting reveals activity cliffs and functional relationships.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Cross modality learning of cell painting and transcriptomics data improves mechanism of action clustering and bioactivity modelling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cell Painting: a decade of discovery and innovation in cellular imaging.Nature methods · 2025Review
- Insights into the Identification of iPSC- and Monocyte-Derived Macrophage-Polarizing Compounds by AI-Fueled Cell Painting Analysis Tools.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Low concentration cell painting images enable the identification of highly potent compounds.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Detection of a Mitochondrial Fragmentation and Integrated Stress Response Using the Cell Painting Assay.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Morphological profiling for drug discovery in the era of deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- A Decade in a Systematic Review: The Evolution and Impact of Cell Painting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The search for chemical hit material is a lengthy and increasingly expensive drug discovery process. To improve it, ligand-based quantitative structure-activity relationship models have been broadly applied to optimize primary and secondary compound properties. Although these models can be deployed as early as the stage of molecule design, they have a limited applicability domain─if the structures of interest differ substantially from the chemical space on which the model was trained, a reliable prediction will not be possible. Image-informed ligand-based models partly solve this shortcoming by focusing on the phenotype of a cell caused by small molecules, rather than on their structure. While this enables chemical diversity expansion, it limits the application to compounds physically available and imaged. Here, we employ an active learning approach to capitalize on both of these methods' strengths and boost the model performance of a mitochondrial toxicity assay (Glu/Gal). Specifically, we used a phenotypic Cell Painting screen to build a chemistry-independent model and adopted the results as the main factor in selecting compounds for experimental testing. With the additional Glu/Gal annotation for selected compounds we were able to dramatically improve the chemistry-informed ligand-based model with respect to the increased recognition of compounds from a 10% broader chemical space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.