Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37327320›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Identifying Mechanisms of Resistance by Circulating Tumor DNA in EVOLVE, a Phase II Trial of Cediranib Plus Olaparib for Ovarian Cancer at Time of PARP Inhibitor Progression.

Stephanie Lheureux, Stephenie D Prokopec, Leslie E Oldfield, Eduardo Gonzalez-Ochoa, Jeffrey P Bruce, Derek Wong, Arnavaz Danesh, Dax Torti, Jonathan Torchia, Alexander Fortuna and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms and disease relevance of DNA break repair pathway choice.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie Lheureux *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4405-5890
Stephenie D Prokopec *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7936-8577
Leslie E OldfieldPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-5580
Eduardo Gonzalez-OchoaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1056-5967
Jeffrey P BrucePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5509-9990
Derek WongPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-5265
Arnavaz DaneshPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4325-3089
Dax TortiOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-5803
Jonathan TorchiaOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-7709
Alexander FortunaOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5587-2151
Sharanjit SinghOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7202-113X
Matthew IrvingOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-8106-179X
Kayla MarshOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2483-7166
Bernard LamOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6437-6491
Vanessa SpeersPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-7047-3988
Aleksandra YosifovaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-5469-539X
Ana OakninGynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-7194
Ainhoa MadariagaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-9762
Neesha C DhaniPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-6932
Valerie BoweringPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0910-5186
Amit M OzaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9510-8641
Trevor J PughPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-5888
University Health Network · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the use of blood cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to identify emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). EXPERIMENTAL

designWe used targeted sequencing (TS) to analyze 78 longitudinal cfDNA samples collected from 30 patients with HGSOC enrolled in a phase II clinical trial evaluating cediranib (VEGF inhibitor) plus olaparib (PARPi) after progression on PARPi alone. cfDNA was collected at baseline, before treatment cycle 2, and at end of treatment. These were compared with whole-exome sequencing (WES) of baseline tumor tissues.

resultsAt baseline (time of initial PARPi progression), cfDNA tumor fractions were 0.2% to 67% (median, 3.25%), and patients with high ctDNA levels (>15%) had a higher tumor burden (sum of target lesions; P = 0.043). Across all timepoints, cfDNA detected 74.4% of mutations known from prior tumor WES, including three of five expected BRCA1/2 reversion mutations. In addition, cfDNA identified 10 novel mutations not detected by WES, including seven TP53 mutations annotated as pathogenic by ClinVar. cfDNA fragmentation analysis attributed five of these novel TP53 mutations to clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). At baseline, samples with significant differences in mutant fragment size distribution had shorter time to progression (P = 0.001).

conclusionsLongitudinal testing of cfDNA by TS provides a noninvasive tool for detection of tumor-derived mutations and mechanisms of PARPi resistance that may aid in directing patients to appropriate therapeutic strategies. With cfDNA fragmentation analyses, CHIP was identified in several patients and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleHumansIndolesPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsQuinazolinesAntineoplastic AgentsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humancediranibCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAIndolesolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID37327320
PMCPMC10502468
OpenAlexW4380992939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.