Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37327245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Supporting SURgery with GEriatric Co-Management and AI (SURGE-Ahead): A study protocol for the development of a digital geriatrician.

Christoph Leinert, Marina Fotteler, Thomas Derya Kocar, Dhayana Dallmeier, Hans A Kestler, Dennis Wolf, Florian Gebhard, Adriane Uihlein, Florian Steger, Reinhold Kilian and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Christoph LeinertInstitute for Geriatric Research at AGAPLESION Bethesda Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-1780
Marina FottelerInstitute for Geriatric Research at AGAPLESION Bethesda Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas Derya KocarInstitute for Geriatric Research at AGAPLESION Bethesda Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Dhayana DallmeierInstitute for Geriatric Research at AGAPLESION Bethesda Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Hans A KestlerInstitute for Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Dennis WolfInstitute for Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-589X
Florian GebhardDepartment for Orthopedic Trauma, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Adriane UihleinDepartment for Orthopedic Trauma, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Florian StegerInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Reinhold KilianDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychiatry II, Section of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Germany.
Annabel S Mueller-StierlinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychiatry II, Section of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Germany.
Christoph W MichalskiDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
André MihaljevicDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1902-657X
Christian BolenzDepartment of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Sabine SchützeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas K HoffmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Graziano OnderDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-metabolic Diseases and Aging, Instituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Karen Andersen-RanbergGeriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Desmond O'NeillCentre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Martin WehlingWorking Group FORTA, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Johannes SchobelDigiHealth Institute, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Walter SwobodaDigiHealth Institute, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Michael DenkingerInstitute for Geriatric Research at AGAPLESION Bethesda Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
SURGE-Ahead Study Group
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEAgaplesion Bethesda Klinik · DENeu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences · DEBoston University · USHeidelberg University · DEIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeriatric co-management is known to improve treatment of older adults in various clinical settings, however, widespread application of the concept is limited due to restricted resources. Digitalization may offer options to overcome these shortages by providing structured, relevant information and decision support tools for medical professionals. We present the SURGE-Ahead project (Supporting SURgery with GEriatric co-management and Artificial Intelligence) addressing this challenge.

methodsA digital application with a dashboard-style user interface will be developed, displaying 1) evidence-based recommendations for geriatric co-management and 2) artificial intelligence-enhanced suggestions for continuity of care (COC) decisions. The development and implementation of the SURGE-Ahead application (SAA) will follow the Medical research council framework for complex medical interventions. In the development phase a minimum geriatric data set (MGDS) will be defined that combines parametrized information from the hospital information system with a concise assessment battery and sensor data. Two literature reviews will be conducted to create an evidence base for co-management and COC suggestions that will be used to display guideline-compliant recommendations. Principles of machine learning will be used for further data processing and COC proposals for the postoperative course. In an observational and AI-development study, data will be collected in three surgical departments of a University Hospital (trauma surgery, general and visceral surgery, urology) for AI-training, feasibility testing of the MGDS and identification of co-management needs. Usability will be tested in a workshop with potential users. During a subsequent project phase, the SAA will be tested and evaluated in clinical routine, allowing its further improvement through an iterative process. DISCUSSION: The outline offers insights into a novel and comprehensive project that combines geriatric co-management with digital support tools to improve inpatient surgical care and continuity of care of older adults.

trial registrationGerman clinical trials registry (Deutsches Register für klinische Studien, DRKS00030684), registered on 21st November 2022.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGeriatriciansAgedHospitalizationHumans

Identifiers

PMID37327245
PMCPMC10275448
OpenAlexW4380875898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.