Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37327216›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2023

Gender and intention to leave healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. healthcare workers: A cross sectional analysis of the HERO registry.

Rachel Apple, Emily C O'Brien, Nancy M Daraiseh, Haolin Xu, Russell L Rothman, Mark Linzer, Laine Thomas, Christianne Roumie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04342806 (Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04342806 completednot on this map

Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO) Registry Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDuke UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled51,466ConditionsHealth Care Worker (HCW), COVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel AppleDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-3584
Emily C O'BrienDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nancy M DaraisehDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Haolin XuDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Russell L RothmanDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Mark LinzerDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Laine ThomasDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Christianne RoumieDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe COVID-19 pandemic stressed the healthcare field, resulting in a worker exodus at the onset and throughout the pandemic and straining healthcare systems. Female healthcare workers face unique challenges that may impact job satisfaction and retention. It is important to understand factors related to healthcare workers' intent to leave their current field.

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that female healthcare workers were more likely than male counterparts to report intention to leave.

designObservational study of healthcare workers enrolled in the Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO) registry. After baseline enrollment, two HERO 'hot topic' survey waves, in May 2021 and December 2021, ascertained intent to leave. Unique participants were included if they responded to at least one of these survey waves.

settingHERO registry, a large national registry that captures healthcare worker and community member experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

participantsRegistry participants self-enrolled online and represent a convenience sample predominantly composed of adult healthcare workers. EXPOSURE(S): Self-reported gender (male, female). MAIN OUTCOME: Primary outcome was intention to leave (ITL), defined as having already left, actively making plans, or considering leaving healthcare or changing current healthcare field but with no active plans. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to examine the odds of intention to leave with adjustment for key covariates.

resultsAmong 4165 responses to either May or December surveys, female gender was associated with increased odds of ITL (42.2% males versus 51.4% females reported intent to leave; aOR 1.36 [1.13, 1.63]). Nurses had 74% higher odds of ITL compared to most other health professionals. Among those who expressed ITL, three quarters reported job-related burnout as a contributor, and one third reported experience of moral injury. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Female healthcare workers had higher odds of intent to leave their healthcare field than males. Additional research is needed to examine the role of family-related stressors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04342806.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIntentionJob SatisfactionMalePandemicsPersonnel TurnoverSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37327216
PMCPMC10275433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.