ArticleIEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics2024
A Visual Environment for Data Driven Protein Modeling and Validation.
Article in IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In structural biology, validation and verification of new atomic models are crucial and necessary steps which limit the production of reliable molecular models for publications and databases. An atomic model is the result of meticulous modeling and matching and is evaluated using a variety of metrics that provide clues to improve and refine the model so it fits our understanding of molecules and physical constraints. In cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM) the validation is also part of an iterative modeling process in which there is a need to judge the quality of the model during the creation phase. A shortcoming is that the process and results of the validation are rarely communicated using visual metaphors. This work presents a visual framework for molecular validation. The framework was developed in close collaboration with domain experts in a participatory design process. Its core is a novel visual representation based on 2D heatmaps that shows all available validation metrics in a linear fashion, presenting a global overview of the atomic model and provide domain experts with interactive analysis tools. Additional information stemming from the underlying data, such as a variety of local quality measures, is used to guide the user's attention toward regions of higher relevance. Linked with the heatmap is a three-dimensional molecular visualization providing the spatial context of the structures and chosen metrics. Additional views of statistical properties of the structure are included in the visual framework. We demonstrate the utility of the framework and its visual guidance with examples from cryo-EM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.