Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37327024›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2023

Effect of Mobile Phone Text Messaging Self-Management Support for Patients With Diabetes or Coronary Heart Disease in a Chronic Disease Management Program (SupportMe) on Blood Pressure: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ngai Wah Cheung, Julie Redfern, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Tien-Ming Hng, Simone Marschner, Rabbia Haider, Sonia Faruquie, Amy Von Huben, Shelley She, Daniel McIntyre and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ngai Wah CheungDepartment of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6323-8006
Julie RedfernSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-5563
Aravinda ThiagalingamDepartment of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7763-7806
Tien-Ming HngBlacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-8813
Simone MarschnerWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5484-9144
Rabbia HaiderDepartment of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-9989
Sonia FaruquieDepartment of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-3853-7070
Amy Von HubenWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-9719
Shelley SheWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-5673
Daniel McIntyreWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-4050
Jin-Gun ChoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-4691
Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-0038
SupportMe InvestigatorsSee Acknowledgments, .
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUBlacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital · AUWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining engagement and support for patients with chronic diseases is challenging. SMS text messaging programs have complemented patient care in a variety of situations. However, such programs have not been widely translated into routine care.

objectiveWe aimed to examine the implementation and utility of a customized SMS text message-based support program for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), coronary heart disease, or both within a chronic disease integrated care program.

methodsWe conducted a 6-month pragmatic parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial that recruited people with T2D or coronary heart disease. Intervention participants received 4 semipersonalized SMS text messages per week providing self-management support to supplement standard care. Preprogrammed algorithms customized content based on participant characteristics, and the messages were sent at random times of the day and in random order by a fully automated SMS text messaging engine. Control participants received standard care and only administrative SMS text messages. The primary outcome was systolic blood pressure. Evaluations were conducted face to face whenever possible by researchers blinded to randomization. Participants with T2D were evaluated for glycated hemoglobin level. Participant-reported experience measures were evaluated using questionnaires and focus groups and summarized using proportions and thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 902 participants were randomized (n=448, 49.7% to the intervention group and n=454, 50.3% to the control group). Primary outcome data were available for 89.5% (807/902) of the participants. At 6 months, there was no difference in systolic blood pressure between the intervention and control arms (adjusted mean difference=0.9 mm Hg, 95% CI -1.1 to 2.1; P=.38). Of 642 participants with T2D, there was no difference in glycated hemoglobin (adjusted mean difference=0.1%, 95% CI -0.1% to 0.3%; P=.35). Self-reported medication adherence was better in the intervention group (relative risk=0.82, 95% CI 0.68-1.00; P=.045). Participants reported that the SMS text messages were useful (298/344, 86.6%) and easily understood (336/344, 97.7%) and motivated change (217/344, 63.1%). The lack of bidirectional messaging was identified as a barrier.

conclusionsThe intervention did not improve blood pressure in this cohort, possibly because of high clinician commitment to improved routine patient care as part of the chronic disease management program as well as favorable baseline metrics. There was high program engagement, acceptability, and perceived value. Feasibility as part of an integrated care program was demonstrated. SMS text messaging programs may supplement chronic disease management and support self-care.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001689460; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371769&isReview=true. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025923.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementText MessagingAustraliaBlood PressureDisease ManagementGlycated HemoglobinHumansSingle-Blind MethodGlycated Hemoglobinchronic diseasecoronary diseasedelivery of health carediabetes mellitusintegratedself-managementSMS text messagingtype 2

Identifiers

PMID37327024
PMCPMC10337246
OpenAlexW4321462468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.