Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326968›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Efficiently quantifying DNA methylation for bulk- and single-cell bisulfite data.

Jonas Fischer, Marcel H Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonas FischerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6459-5053
Marcel H SchulzDepartment for Computational Biology and Applied Algorithmics, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-3656

Funding

Unraveling the Complexities of Risk and Mechanism in CancerR35CA220523 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2018 to 2024
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA220523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDNA CpG methylation (CpGm) has proven to be a crucial epigenetic factor in the mammalian gene regulatory system. Assessment of DNA CpG methylation values via whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) is, however, computationally extremely demanding.

resultsWe present FAst MEthylation calling (FAME), the first approach to quantify CpGm values directly from bulk or single-cell WGBS reads without intermediate output files. FAME is very fast but as accurate as standard methods, which first produce BS alignment files before computing CpGm values. We present experiments on bulk and single-cell bisulfite datasets in which we show that data analysis can be significantly sped-up and help addressing the current WGBS analysis bottleneck for large-scale datasets without compromising accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of FAME is open source and licensed under GPL-3.0 at https://github.com/FischerJo/FAME.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationSoftwareAnimalsDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMammalsSequence Analysis, DNASulfitesDNAhydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID37326968
PMCPMC10310462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.