ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Consistency of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Diagnostic Support Software in Short-term Digital Mammography Reimaging After Core Needle Biopsy.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the consistency in the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic support software in short-term digital mammography reimaging after core needle biopsy. Of 276 women who underwent short-term (<3 mo) serial digital mammograms followed by breast cancer surgery from Jan. to Dec. 2017, 550 breasts were included. All core needle biopsies for breast lesions were performed between serial exams. All mammography images were analyzed using a commercially available AI-based software providing an abnormality score (0-100). Demographic data for age, interval between serial exams, biopsy, and final diagnosis were compiled. Mammograms were reviewed for mammographic density and finding. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the distribution of variables according to biopsy and to test the interaction effects of variables with the difference in AI-based score according to biopsy. AI-based score of 550 exams (benign or normal in 263 and malignant in 287) showed significant difference between malignant and benign/normal exams (0.48 vs. 91.97 in first exam and 0.62 vs. 87.13 in second exam, P<0.0001). In comparison of serial exams, no significant difference was found in AI-based score. AI-based score difference between serial exams was significantly different according to biopsy performed or not (-0.25 vs. 0.07, P = 0.035). In linear regression analysis, there was no significant interaction effect of all clinical and mammographic characteristics with mammographic examinations performed after biopsy or not. The results from AI-based diagnostic support software for digital mammography was relatively consistent in short-term reimaging even after core needle biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.