Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326856›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Accuracy of prenatal detection of facial clefts and relation between facial clefts, additional malformations and chromosomal abnormalities: a large referral-center cohort.

Florence Vibert, Guel Schmidt, Kerstin Löffler, Adam Gasiorek-Wiens, Wolfgang Henrich, Stefan Verlohren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Orofacial clefts in newborns in Brazil: a time series study, 2010-2021.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florence VibertDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité-Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Guel SchmidtDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin LöfflerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Adam Gasiorek-WiensDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité-Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang HenrichDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité-Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan VerlohrenDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité-Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. stefan.verlohren@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-8636
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFacial clefts belong to the most common congenital malformations and their prenatal diagnosis is a constant challenge. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in correctly classifying facial clefts. Furthermore, we aimed to specify the distribution of the type of clefts and underlying genetic conditions.

methodsAll fetuses seen with suspected facial cleft in the Department of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin during a period of 23 years (1999-2022) were included in this retrospective study. Clefts were classified according to the classification of Nyberg. All additional prenatal findings were assessed and correlated with the outcome. The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis was assessed.

results292 patients were included in the study. The most common type of clefts were unilateral cleft lip and palate (CL-P) (53.6%) and bilateral CL-P (30.6%), followed by CL (8.1%), CP (5.1%) and median CL-P (2.6%). The overall pre- and postnatal concordance rate corresponding to a correct prenatal diagnosis was high, 88.9%, ranging from 73.7% (CL) to 93.7% (unilateral CL-P). Most of the median clefts (95.2%) and CP (93.3%) were associated with other sonographic abnormalities, as well as 52.2% of bilateral CL-P. Chromosomal abnormalities, mostly trisomy 13 and trisomy 18, were observed in in the median CL-P (47.6%), bilateral CL-P (31.1%) and CP (26.7%) groups, in contrast to the CL (9.1%) and unilateral CL-P (12.9%) groups. It was exceptional to have a chromosomal abnormality without additional malformations (4.8%). The mortality rate including one late miscarriage, 5 IUFD's, 74 TOPs and 6 palliative cares at birth was 29.8%, particularly high for median clefts (90.5%).

conclusionPrenatal ultrasound exhibited a high accuracy to assess the type of facial clefts with an average rate of 88.9% (73.7%-93.7%) and a concordance rate of up to 93.7%, depending on the type of cleft. The search for additional malformations as well as clarifying underlying genetic conditions is essential. This allows for a targeted counseling of the parents and to best prepare for postnatal care, including surgery by the maxillofacial team.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, PrenatalAdditional malformationsChromosomal abnormalitiesCleft lipCleft palateDiagnostic accuracyPrenatal diagnosisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37326856
PMCPMC11018668
OpenAlexW4380869638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.