Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2024
Belimumab treatment of adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02347891 (Belimumab for Maintenance Therapy in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Belimumab for Maintenance Therapy in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review on the use of belimumab in other connective tissue diseases and vasculitides.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Flares and definition of worsening in inflammatory myopathies: a narrative review of the literature.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- A pilot study of telitacicept in predominantly immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, retrospective analysis of a monocentric Chinese cohort.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Targeted Therapy for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Review
- Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy-Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Its Pathogenesis and Physical Therapy Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Targeting B Cells for the Treatment of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Treatment Algorithms for Inflammatory Myopathies in Adults: from Guidelines to Clinical Practice.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2025Article
- Emerging B and plasma cell-targeting immune therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Updates in Pathogenesis and Biomarkers, Current Treatment, and Emerging Targeted Therapies.Paediatric drugs · 2025Review
- Internet-based enrollment of a myositis patient cohort-a national experience.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Observational
- Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy (IMNM): A Story of Antibodies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate belimumab addition to the standard of care in patents with refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).
methodsWe conducted a 40-week multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 1:1 IV belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo randomization and a 24-week open-label extension. Clinical responses were measured by the definition of improvement (DOI) and total improvement score (TIS). Flow cytometry analyses were performed on available samples before randomization, at 24 and 60-64 weeks. Descriptive statistics, t-test, Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance tests were used.
resultsA total of 17 patients were randomized, 15 received five or more doses of belimumab or placebo and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. More belimumab patients vs placebo attained a TIS ≥40 [55.5% vs 33.3%; P = non-significant (NS)] and achieved the DOI (33.3% vs 16.7%; P = NS) at weeks 40 and 64; the mean TIS was similar among groups. Two patients achieved major responses (TIS = 72.5) after week 40 in the belimumab arm and none in the placebo arm. No improvement in the placebo arm after switching to the open-label phase was observed. There was no steroid-sparing effect. No new safety signals were detected. Although total B cells were not reduced, belimumab induced naïve B cell depletion while enhancing the number and frequency memory B cells.
conclusionThe study did not meet the primary endpoint and no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical responses between arms. More patients achieved sustained TIS ≥40 and reached the DOI. Most patients who received belimumab for >40 weeks had clinical improvement. Phenotypic changes in B cell populations were not associated with clinical responses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), NCT02347891.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.