Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326817›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

An automated screening model for aortic emergencies using convolutional neural networks and cropped computed tomography angiography images of the aorta.

Tomoki Wada, Masamichi Takahashi, Hiroki Matsunaga, Go Kawai, Risa Kaneshima, Munetaka Machida, Nana Fujita, Yujiro Matsuoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tomoki WadaDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan. towada-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Masamichi TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki MatsunagaTertiary Emergency Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Go KawaiDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Risa KaneshimaDepartment of Radiology, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Munetaka MachidaDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nana FujitaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yujiro MatsuokaDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 19K17253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with aortic emergencies, such as aortic dissection and rupture, are at risk of rapid deterioration, necessitating prompt diagnosis. This study introduces a novel automated screening model for computed tomography angiography (CTA) of patients with aortic emergencies, utilizing deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithms.

methodsOur model (Model A) initially predicted the positions of the aorta in the original axial CTA images and extracted the sections containing the aorta from these images. Subsequently, it predicted whether the cropped images showed aortic lesions. To compare the predictive performance of Model A in identifying aortic emergencies, we also developed Model B, which directly predicted the presence or absence of aortic lesions in the original images. Ultimately, these models categorized patients based on the presence or absence of aortic emergencies, as determined by the number of consecutive images expected to show the lesion.

resultsThe models were trained with 216 CTA scans and tested with 220 CTA scans. Model A demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) for patient-level classification of aortic emergencies than Model B (0.995; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.990-1.000 vs. 0.972; 95% CI, 0.950-0.994, respectively; p = 0.013). Among patients with aortic emergencies, the AUC of Model A for patient-level classification of aortic emergencies involving the ascending aorta was 0.971 (95% CI, 0.931-1.000).

conclusionThe model utilizing DCNNs and cropped CTA images of the aorta effectively screened CTA scans of patients with aortic emergencies. This study would help develop a computer-aided triage system for CT scans, prioritizing the reading for patients requiring urgent care and ultimately promoting rapid responses to patients with aortic emergencies.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyEmergenciesAortaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAortic dissectionAortic ruptureComputed tomography angiographyComputer-aided diagnosisDeep learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.