ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
An automated screening model for aortic emergencies using convolutional neural networks and cropped computed tomography angiography images of the aorta.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time Is Aorta: Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Surgical Timelines in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Performance of image-based deep learning models for aortic dissection segmentation and diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven diagnosis of acute thoracic aortic dissection: integrating imaging, biomarkers, and clinical workflows-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A model fusion method based DAT-DenseNet for classification and diagnosis of aortic dissection.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with aortic emergencies, such as aortic dissection and rupture, are at risk of rapid deterioration, necessitating prompt diagnosis. This study introduces a novel automated screening model for computed tomography angiography (CTA) of patients with aortic emergencies, utilizing deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithms.
methodsOur model (Model A) initially predicted the positions of the aorta in the original axial CTA images and extracted the sections containing the aorta from these images. Subsequently, it predicted whether the cropped images showed aortic lesions. To compare the predictive performance of Model A in identifying aortic emergencies, we also developed Model B, which directly predicted the presence or absence of aortic lesions in the original images. Ultimately, these models categorized patients based on the presence or absence of aortic emergencies, as determined by the number of consecutive images expected to show the lesion.
resultsThe models were trained with 216 CTA scans and tested with 220 CTA scans. Model A demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) for patient-level classification of aortic emergencies than Model B (0.995; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.990-1.000 vs. 0.972; 95% CI, 0.950-0.994, respectively; p = 0.013). Among patients with aortic emergencies, the AUC of Model A for patient-level classification of aortic emergencies involving the ascending aorta was 0.971 (95% CI, 0.931-1.000).
conclusionThe model utilizing DCNNs and cropped CTA images of the aorta effectively screened CTA scans of patients with aortic emergencies. This study would help develop a computer-aided triage system for CT scans, prioritizing the reading for patients requiring urgent care and ultimately promoting rapid responses to patients with aortic emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37326817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.