Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326799›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health economics and management2023

Medicaid physician fees and the use of primary care services: evidence from before and after the ACA fee bump.

Anuj Gangopadhyaya, Robert Kaestner, Cuiping Schiman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health economics and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anuj GangopadhyayaDepartment of Economics, Loyola University Chicago, 820 Schreiber Center 16 E. Pearson St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Robert KaestnerThe Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, 1307 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Cuiping SchimanDepartment of Economics, Georgia Southern University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA, 31419, USA. cschiman@georgiasouthern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-0862
Georgia Southern University · USPearson (United States) · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Medicaid Physician Fee and Avoidable HospitalizationR01AG043513 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KAESTNER, ROBERT · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine whether fees paid by Medicaid for primary care affects the use of health care services among adults with Medicaid coverage who have a high school or less than high school degree. The analysis spans the large changes in Medicaid fees that occurred before and after the ACA-mandated fee increase for primary care services in 2013-2014. We use data from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System and a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the association between Medicaid fees and whether a person has a personal doctor; a routine check-up or flu shot in the past year; whether a woman had a pap test or a mammogram in the past year; whether a person has ever been diagnosed with asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, COPD, arthritis, depression, or kidney diseases; and, whether a person reports good-to-excellent health. Estimates indicate that Medicaid fee increases were associated with small increases in the likelihood of having a personal doctor, or receiving a flu shot, although only having a personal doctor remained significant when accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. We conclude that Medicaid fees did not have a major impact on the use of primary care or on the consequences of that care.

Indexed as

MedicaidPhysiciansAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary Health CareUnited StatesFee-for-serviceMedicaidPrimary careReimbursement

Identifiers

PMID37326799
OpenAlexW4380869566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.