Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326637›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2023

[Digital guidelines of the twenty-first century : Requirements for the structured development, application and evaluation of medical knowledge].

Patrick Meybohm, Alexander Ghanem, Falk von Dincklage, Peter Kranke, Philipp Börm

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick MeybohmKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland. meybohm_p@ukw.de.
Alexander GhanemInnere Medizin II, Asklepios Klinik Nord-Heidberg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Falk von DincklageKlinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv‑, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
Peter KrankeKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Philipp BörmBörm Bruckmeier Verlag GmbH, Grünwald, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until now, clinical guidelines have been understood as generalized representations of clinical knowledge that, based on best available evidence, show the requirements for patient care in specific patient situations. This expert opinion article is intended to discuss how digital guidelines should be designed and which requirements must be met for the structured development, application and evaluation of such guidelines. The digitalization of guidelines must take into account the transformation of analogue text-based guideline information into formats that enable human-machine interaction via user interfaces, that show physicians the requirements for guideline-compliant patient care and that also enable machine storage, machine execution and machine processing of patient data.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyInformation Storage and RetrievalGuidelines as TopicHumansDecision support systemDigitalizationGuidelinesInteroperabilityMedical device

Identifiers

PMID37326637
PMCPMC10400475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.