Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326603›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Characterizing Ultrafine Particle Mobile Monitoring Data for Epidemiology.

Annie Doubleday, Magali N Blanco, Elena Austin, Julian D Marshall, Timothy V Larson, Lianne Sheppard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annie DoubledayDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-8668
Magali N BlancoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-995X
Elena AustinDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-1042
Julian D MarshallDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4087-1209
Timothy V LarsonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Lianne SheppardDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental HealthT32ES015459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI June T. Spector · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
Air Pollution, the Aging Brain and Alzheimer's DiseaseR01ES026187 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LI, GAIL, SHEPPARD, ELIZABETH A LIANNE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026187NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile monitoring is increasingly used to assess exposure to traffic-related air pollutants (TRAPs), including ultrafine particles (UFPs). Due to the rapid spatial decrease in the concentration of UFPs and other TRAPs with distance from roadways, mobile measurements may be non-representative of residential exposures, which are commonly used for epidemiologic studies. Our goal was to develop, apply, and test one possible approach for using mobile measurements in exposure assessment for epidemiology. We used an absolute principal component score model to adjust the contribution of on-road sources in mobile measurements to provide exposure predictions representative of cohort locations. We then compared UFP predictions at residential locations from mobile on-road plume-adjusted versus stationary measurements to understand the contribution of mobile measurements and characterize their differences. We found that predictions from mobile measurements are more representative of cohort locations after down-weighting the contribution of localized on-road plumes. Further, predictions at cohort locations derived from mobile measurements incorporate more spatial variation compared to those from short-term stationary data. Sensitivity analyses suggest that this additional spatial information captures features in the exposure surface not identified from the stationary data alone. We recommend the correction of mobile measurements to create exposure predictions representative of residential exposure for epidemiology.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterVehicle EmissionsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterVehicle Emissionsabsolute principal component scoreair pollution epidemiologyexposure assessmentprediction modelstraffic-related air pollutionultrafine particles

Identifiers

PMID37326603
PMCPMC11991631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.