ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2023
Quantitative alignment parameter estimation for analyzing X-ray photoelectron spectra.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surfaces of Atmospheric Droplet Models Probed with Synchrotron XPS on a Liquid Microjet.Accounts of chemical research · 2024Article
- Inversion model for extracting chemically resolved depth profiles across liquid interfaces of various configurations from XPS data: PROPHESY.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interpretation of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data relies on measurement models that depend on several parameters, including the photoelectron attenuation length and X-ray photon flux. However, some of these parameters are not known, because they are not or cannot be measured. The unknown geometrical parameters can be lumped together in a multiplicative factor, the alignment parameter. This parameter characterizes the ability of the exciting light to interact with the sample. Unfortunately, the absolute value of the alignment parameter cannot be measured directly, in part because it depends on the measurement model. Instead, a proxy for the experimental alignment is often estimated, which is closely related to the alignment parameter. Here, a method for estimating the absolute value of the alignment parameter based on the raw XPS spectra (i.e. non-processed photoelectron counts), the geometry of the sample and the photoelectron attenuation length is presented. The proposed parameter estimation method enables the quantitative analysis of XPS spectra using a simplified measurement model. All computations can be executed within the open and free Julia language framework PROPHESY. To demonstrate feasibility, the alignment parameter estimation method is first tested on simulated data with known acquisition parameters. The method is then applied to experimental XPS data and a strong correlation between the estimated alignment parameter and the typically used alignment proxy is shown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.