Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326441›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

EraSOR: a software tool to eliminate inflation caused by sample overlap in polygenic score analyses.

Shing Wan Choi, Timothy Shin Heng Mak, Clive J Hoggart, Paul F O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Methods for modeling gene-environment interplay using polygenic risk scores.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. GRPa-PRS: A risk stratification method to identify genetically-regulated pathways in polygenic diseases.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Addressing overfitting bias due to sample overlap in polygenic risk scoring.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dementias Platform UK: Bringing genetics into life.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shing Wan ChoiDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2215-3238
Timothy Shin Heng MakCentre of Genomic Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-2406
Clive J HoggartDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6875-6993
Paul F O'ReillyDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-0845

Funding

Next-generation, pathway-specific, polygenic risk scoresR01MH122866 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI O'REILLY, PAUL FRANCIS · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Big Omics Data Engine 2 SupercomputerS10OD026880 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
NIH HHS R01MH122866NIH HHS S10 OD026880NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolygenic risk score (PRS) analyses are now routinely applied across biomedical research. However, as PRS studies grow in size, there is an increased risk of sample overlap between the genome-wide association study (GWAS) from which the PRS is derived and the "target sample," in which PRSs are computed and hypotheses are tested. Despite the wide recognition of the sample overlap problem, its potential impact on the results from PRS studies has not yet been quantified, and no analytical solution has been provided.

findingsHere, we first conduct a comprehensive investigation into the scale of the sample overlap problem, finding that PRS results can be substantially inflated even in the presence of minimal overlap. Next, we introduce a method and software, EraSOR (Erase Sample Overlap and Relatedness), which eliminates the inflation caused by sample overlap (and close relatedness) in almost all settings tested here.

conclusionsEraSOR could be useful in PRS studies (with target sample >1,000) similar to those investigated here, either (i) to mitigate the potential effects of known or unknown intercohort overlap and close relatedness or (ii) as a sensitivity tool to highlight the possible presence of sample overlap before its direct removal, when possible, or else to provide a lower bound on PRS analysis results after accounting for potential sample overlap.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37326441
PMCPMC10273836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.